The Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration convened on May 21, 2025, to discuss the implications of a recent executive order mandating state employees to return to the office four days a week starting July 1. The meeting focused on the logistics, challenges, and potential impacts of this transition on state employees and departmental operations.

The discussion began with inquiries about the implementation timeline and the responsibilities of individual departments in managing the return to work. It was clarified that each department would handle its own assessments regarding employee classifications, office space needs, and any necessary accommodations. However, many departments are still in the process of determining how many employees will be affected and what specific needs they may have.

Concerns were raised about the lack of clarity surrounding the number of employees currently teleworking and how many would be returning to the office. Estimates indicated that approximately 8,000 employees telework at least one day a week, with around 88,000 receiving stipends for teleworking three or more days. This raises questions about the potential impact on office space and resources, especially in areas like downtown Sacramento, which is already facing parking and construction challenges.

The rationale behind the executive order was discussed, emphasizing the belief that in-person collaboration enhances creativity, problem-solving, and workplace culture. However, some committee members expressed skepticism about the necessity of increasing in-office days from two to four, suggesting that effective collaboration could still occur with fewer in-person requirements.

Union representatives and state employees voiced their concerns during public comments, highlighting the financial burdens that increased office attendance could impose on employees, such as commuting costs and reduced telework stipends. They also pointed out that many departments had successfully maintained productivity while teleworking, questioning the need for a return to the office.

As the meeting concluded, it was evident that significant uncertainties remain regarding the implementation of the executive order. The committee acknowledged the need for further discussions and possibly additional hearings to gather more detailed information from individual departments before the July deadline. The overall sentiment reflected a desire for clarity and consideration of employee needs as the state navigates this transition.