The Yarmouth Zoning Board of Appeals convened on May 22, 2025, to discuss a petition regarding the Harborside Suites' proposed change of use to seasonal worker housing. The meeting began with a review of the petitioner's plans, which included the provision of on-site proctors to oversee the housing arrangements for seasonal employees.
During the discussion, it was confirmed that two proctors, a married couple, would reside on the property to ensure compliance with rules and regulations. The proctors will also be responsible for informing seasonal employees about the code of behavior prior to their occupancy. The board noted that the proctors' contact information would be submitted to the local police department and the building commissioner’s office.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The facilities were described as equipped with microwaves and refrigerators, although they lack cooktops. It was clarified that the seasonal employees would not stay beyond October 31, with most expected to leave by October 1.
The board then opened the floor to public comments. A letter from Robert Mulvey, a long-time resident, expressed opposition to the petition, citing concerns about public safety and tranquility, referencing recent illegal activities in the area. Mulvey urged the board to deny the appeal and require the property to operate under a licensed status.
In response, the petitioner’s counsel emphasized that the seasonal workers would not be involved in any illegal activities and assured that any issues would be reported to the authorities.
A participant on Zoom raised questions regarding the status of the Harborside Suites' pool, which was noted as unfinished and not expected to open this season. Additionally, inquiries were made about who would be responsible for paying for the accommodations, to which it was clarified that the employees would cover their own costs through their wages.
As the meeting progressed towards deliberation, board members expressed support for the petition, recognizing the need for employee housing in the area. The discussion highlighted the importance of balancing business needs with community concerns.
The meeting concluded with the board preparing to make a decision on the petition, reflecting on the discussions and public input received.