Planning Commission approves new single family home project following SB 9 lot split

The Glendale Design Review Board convened on May 22, 2025, to discuss a proposed residential project involving the construction of a single-family home on a newly created flag-shaped lot. The project aims to build a 1,200 square foot, one-story residence on a site that was previously part of a larger property, which underwent a lot split under California's SB 9 legislation.

The meeting began with a presentation detailing the background of the project. The site, prior to the split, included a single-family dwelling, a detached garage, and a 600 square foot accessory dwelling unit (ADU). The lot split, approved earlier in 2024, resulted in two parcels: a larger front lot and the subject rear lot, which is approximately 6,100 square feet. The existing garage and ADU will remain on the new lot and serve as accessories to the proposed home.

The proposed residence will be set back approximately 133 feet from the street and will comply with zoning regulations, including a six-foot interior setback. According to SB 9 requirements, the project necessitates only one parking space, which will be accommodated within the existing garage. The front unit will also have improved parking, sharing a common driveway with the new residence.

In terms of design, the proposed home will feature a modest height of 16 feet and will be largely concealed from the street by the existing structures. While staff expressed support for the overall massing of the project, they provided several recommendations for design enhancements. These included raising the gabled roof by one to two feet for visual interest, using half barrel caps on the roof, and adding windows to avoid blank facades on the sides of the building. Staff also suggested incorporating decorative elements, such as a Spanish-style niche, to enhance the aesthetic appeal of the home.

Overall, the staff recommended approval of the project with conditions aimed at improving its design. The board's discussions highlighted the importance of maintaining visual interest and architectural character in new developments within the community. The meeting concluded with a consensus on the need for further refinements to the design before final approval.