Chandler community leaders advocate for special election on city charter amendments

The City of Chandler Council convened on May 22, 2025, to discuss several key issues, primarily focusing on Resolution 59 13, which proposes a special election to amend the city charter regarding consecutive terms for council members and the mayor.

The meeting began with a community leader from Legislative District 12 expressing strong support for the resolution. He emphasized the importance of clarifying the charter's language on consecutive terms to preserve historical practices and avoid costly litigation. He urged council members to place the amendment on the November ballot, arguing it would provide voters with clear guidance and prevent any perception of partisan interference.

Following this, several residents voiced their opinions. Dwayne Littmann expressed his support for the resolution, stating he had reviewed the proposed amendments and believed they would help maintain Chandler's successful governance model. Joe Granado, a long-time resident, shared his concerns about the legal interpretations of the charter, advocating for the amendment while also highlighting the need for clarity in the legal language.

Renee Lopez cautioned against rushing the amendment, suggesting that it could expose the city to further scrutiny and undermine public trust. He called for a thorough review of the charter before making any changes. Franchesca Martin, another resident, echoed these sentiments, arguing that the new interpretation of the charter could unfairly bar dedicated public servants from running for mayor. She urged the council to allow voters to decide on the proposed amendments.

Beth Bridal also supported the resolution, highlighting the need for clarity to avoid confusion and litigation. She pointed out that Chandler has a history of council members successfully transitioning to the mayoral role after serving two terms, and she urged the council to let voters decide on the amendments.

Council member Rick Heumann reflected on his past experience serving on the council and the changes made to the charter in 2012, which he believed were beneficial.

The council's discussions highlighted a mix of support and caution regarding the proposed amendments, with several residents advocating for a clear and fair process to address the charter's language. The meeting concluded with a call for further deliberation on the resolution and its implications for the city's governance.