California Dental Board debates infection control course requirements for dental assistants

The Dental Board of California is considering a significant change regarding infection control training for dental assistants. During the meeting on May 15, 2025, discussions centered on whether to maintain or remove Subdivision G from the proposed regulations. This subdivision currently mandates that unlicensed dental assistants complete a specific infection control course, which is not required for Registered Dental Assistants (RDAs) or other licensed professionals.

Melody Randolph, representing the Alliance, voiced strong opposition to the removal of Subdivision G, arguing that it would create unequal educational standards for dental assistants and RDAs. She emphasized that RDAs undergo rigorous hands-on training for infection control, and allowing different educational pathways could undermine the integrity of the licensure process.

Conversely, Tuca Zocayi from the California Dental Association (CDA) supported the removal of Subdivision G, suggesting that if an online course meeting the same competencies as in-person training becomes available, it should be acceptable. Zocayi pointed out that the hands-on experience gained during the RDA training process would still provide adequate preparation for infection control responsibilities.

Additional public comments highlighted the importance of maintaining hands-on components in training, particularly for CPR and infection control, regardless of licensure status. Sherry Becker, a representative in the audience, urged the board to consider the necessity of practical training for all dental assistants.

As the board deliberates, the outcome of this decision could reshape the educational requirements for dental assistants in California, impacting future licensure pathways and training standards. The board is expected to weigh the implications of these discussions carefully, balancing the need for rigorous training with the desire to streamline the licensure process.