Dental Board considers 90-day training requirement for new dental assistants

In a recent meeting of the Dental Board of California, held on May 15, 2025, board members and public representatives engaged in a crucial discussion regarding the timeline for dental assistants to complete required training courses. The conversation centered around the proposed 90-day period for new hires to complete their training, a significant reduction from previous regulations.

As the meeting unfolded, board member Dr. Felsenfeld emphasized the need for clarity, expressing that the 90-day timeframe would benefit all stakeholders involved—consumers, employers, and dental assistants alike. He noted the current challenges in staffing, where newly hired assistants sometimes fail to show up for work after completing their training. This reality underscores the importance of a flexible training schedule that accommodates both the needs of the dental practices and the assistants.

Public comments echoed this sentiment. Sherry Becker, representing the Alliance, reminded attendees of a previous regulation that allowed unlicensed dental assistants 120 days to complete their training, which included hands-on clinical experience. This historical context highlighted the ongoing evolution of training requirements in response to workforce needs.

Otukas Okai from the California Dental Association also voiced support for the proposed 90-day period, citing the difficulties faced by member dentists in hiring qualified staff due to stringent training prerequisites. He pointed out that the changes made in 2025 had exacerbated staffing shortages, making the proposed adjustment a necessary step toward alleviating these challenges.

Additionally, a suggestion was made for employers to provide online training to new assistants before they begin working, which could further streamline the onboarding process. This idea reflects a growing trend towards flexible training solutions in the dental field.

As the meeting progressed, the board moved towards formalizing the motion to adopt the 90-day training requirement, with legal language being prepared to ensure clarity and compliance. The discussions highlighted a collective recognition of the need for adaptability in training regulations, aiming to support both the dental workforce and the quality of care provided to patients.

The outcome of this meeting could have significant implications for the dental industry in California, as it seeks to balance the demands of training with the urgent need for qualified personnel in a challenging labor market. As the board prepares to finalize its decision, the focus remains on fostering a supportive environment for dental assistants and their employers.