During the Minot City Council meeting on May 19, 2025, significant discussions centered around the implementation of a new surveillance system and its implications for community safety and civil liberties. The council unanimously approved an amended policy related to the current Axiom system, while also considering the future adoption of the Flock system, which raised concerns among council members regarding privacy and misuse.

Alderman Pitner emphasized the need for clear guidelines and consequences for any misuse of the surveillance system, highlighting the importance of protecting both citizens and law enforcement officers. He expressed support for the policy, citing the need for enhanced safety measures in the community, especially in light of concerns about child abductions and missing persons.

However, not all council members shared this perspective. Alderman Lehi raised alarms about passive surveillance, arguing that it could infringe on civil liberties and lead to a slippery slope of government overreach. He cautioned against trading freedom for safety, a sentiment echoed by other members who voiced their apprehensions about the potential for misuse of the tracking capabilities of the system.

The council ultimately decided to table the discussion on the Flock system until a full council could convene, acknowledging the need for further deliberation on funding and policy specifics. This decision reflects the council's commitment to ensuring that any new measures align with community values and address public concerns adequately.

In addition to the surveillance discussions, public comments were invited on various topics, including a request for a public hearing on mosquito spraying, underscoring the council's recognition of the importance of community input on decisions that affect residents' daily lives.

As the council moves forward, the outcomes of these discussions will play a crucial role in shaping the safety and privacy landscape in Minot, balancing the need for security with the preservation of civil liberties.