New Lenox officials reject solar facility citing residential concerns and agricultural impact

In a recent Will County Board meeting held on May 15, 2025, significant discussions centered around the controversial topic of solar energy facilities, particularly their placement near residential areas. The board members expressed strong opposition to a proposed solar project, citing concerns over public safety, environmental impact, and community preferences.

Member Pretzel led the charge against the solar facility, emphasizing the community's apprehensions regarding drinking water safety and the potential hazards posed by solar panels during extreme weather. He highlighted the area's suitability for residential development, noting upcoming infrastructure improvements that would enhance access to local amenities, including schools and recreational areas. Pretzel urged his colleagues to reject the solar proposal, framing it as incompatible with the community's needs and desires.

Other board members echoed these sentiments, with Member Hickey acknowledging the legal constraints they face but expressing a desire to prioritize residents' concerns. Member Balich called for a legal opinion on the board's ability to engage with constituents about land use, while also noting the hardships voiced by residents during public hearings. He argued that these hardships should influence their decision-making process.

Member O'Gala criticized the solar facility's attorney for making unfounded claims about the benefits of the project, asserting that local farmers are committed to maintaining the land's quality. He reiterated the board's consistent stance against solar developments near residential areas, emphasizing the need for legislative changes to better protect community interests.

The board ultimately voted against the solar project, with 16 members opposing it. This decision reflects a broader trend in Will County, where residents have increasingly voiced their opposition to solar facilities in favor of preserving agricultural land and maintaining the character of their communities.

As the board navigates these contentious issues, the implications of their decisions extend beyond immediate concerns, potentially influencing future land use policies and the balance between renewable energy development and community welfare. The board's commitment to listening to constituents suggests a proactive approach to governance, as they await further developments in state legislation regarding solar energy.