Smithfield residents urge council to oppose state's proposed assault weapons ban

Residents of Smithfield voiced strong opposition to a proposed assault weapons ban during the Town Council meeting on May 20, 2025. Dan Kiesler, a long-time resident, urged the council to discuss the ban at their next meeting, highlighting potential financial burdens on the town if the law passes. He emphasized that without a federal mandate, Smithfield would be responsible for the storage and maintenance of surrendered firearms, which could lead to costly litigation if the firearms are damaged or lost.

Kiesler, representing a local nonprofit focused on firearm safety, argued that many community members support the Second Amendment and would be adversely affected by the ban. He called for the council to take a stand against the legislation, citing the lack of a significant gun problem in the state and the potential for the law to be overturned by the Supreme Court.

Other residents echoed Kiesler's sentiments. Joe Varon criticized the bill as being influenced by out-of-state interests and called for the council to consider materials he provided that outline the issues with the proposed legislation. Jeff Gross, a writer and gun rights advocate, argued that the ban would violate constitutional rights, referencing past Supreme Court decisions that support the legality of commonly used firearms.

Glenn Gresco, another Smithfield resident, reinforced the call for the council to join other towns in opposing the ban, stating that lawmakers should uphold their oath to protect the Constitution. The meeting underscored a growing local movement against the proposed legislation, with residents urging their council to take action in defense of their rights and financial interests.