Saco Board reviews Millbrook subdivision plans amid buffering concerns

The Saco Planning Board convened on May 20, 2025, to discuss ongoing developments in the city, focusing primarily on a proposed residential project adjacent to Millbrook. The meeting highlighted significant discussions regarding environmental considerations, particularly concerning the Blanding's turtle habitat and the necessary buffering zones around tributary streams.

The meeting began with a review of previous discussions, particularly the need for feedback from the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (IF&W) regarding potential surveys for the Blanding's turtle. The board received confirmation from IF&W that no additional surveys were required, although they recommended maintaining a 100-foot buffer around the habitat. The developers proposed a 75-foot buffer for their tributary streams, which sparked considerable debate among board members.

Caleb, a representative for the developers, outlined the project’s layout, emphasizing efforts to minimize environmental impact while accommodating the proposed housing units. He noted that adjustments would be made to the plan to address concerns about encroachments into the buffer zones. The developers plan to enhance the landscape with native plantings to reinforce the buffer areas, which are currently not densely forested.

Board members expressed mixed feelings about the proposal. Some, like Jim, raised concerns about the adequacy of the proposed buffers, suggesting that the board should not grant preliminary approval until a final plan is presented. He highlighted the complexity of the findings of fact required for approval, indicating that the board might need more time to review these details.

Jeff echoed similar concerns, emphasizing the need for greater environmental protection and questioning the feasibility of the proposed density in light of the surrounding industrial zoning. He expressed worries about the potential noise and disruption from nearby auto dealerships, suggesting that future residents might not enjoy their living spaces as intended.

In contrast, other board members, including one who remained optimistic about the project, argued that potential residents would be aware of the surrounding environment and might find the proposed development appealing compared to denser urban areas.

The discussion concluded with a consensus that further review of the buffering requirements and the final project plan is necessary before moving forward. The board agreed to continue deliberations in future meetings, aiming to balance the need for housing development with environmental stewardship and community well-being.