[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6535093,"mediaKeyId","3426126-f9a683395500a4e6e4b74b2e6117cec8","parentId",3426126,"title","Votes at a glance: Montgomery County committee actions advanced to full legislature on May 20","audioSeconds",2464,"startMs",31000,"endMs",2495000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3426126-f9a683395500a4e6e4b74b2e6117cec8&start=31&end=2495","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3426126-f9a683395500a4e6e4b74b2e6117cec8/thumbnail_31000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6535093/Montgomery-County/New-York/Votes-at-a-glance-Montgomery-County-committee-actions-advanced-to-full-legislature-on-May-20","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6535093-5f78103715e54866293a35a3eadc859b/orig.mp4?Expires=1775971772&Signature=GCi849VZ1WvAw~TjuLQJY3eSIz-pFhOrClV--sRkeiOi1qlNCIVIw6mGeQKkPkCdwRepUaxZ-oq66NGJddCwS6olD3tPsFoT4So-96TY5GjY5kIdyt~eZ3DTjIj9VN7E-~--V-HpXxCcw3NqhL1ZrLTUqvImDxB9DFIjv72osa1gMx76MNucR2McNIe0McpHdmRZKwFtgomk-JdLRpH5uTEVXv-zxjA24qSpJCXLR2sIddeROXH6tLT3cGXxuvby~csuwOg97SrQEBI3PUQAMWcoa2pkTHKZ13mgmncdSCEoWEbGHZbFR6UnBOcSQblkB~mwIHWC6eTzX4bz0Ow5Gg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Montgomery County, NY","date","2025-05-20T00:00:00Z","article","Several resolutions across committees were approved by their respective committees on May 20 and advanced to the full Montgomery County Legislature for final action. The following is a concise list of actions recorded in committee with the committee outcome that was announced in the transcript.

Votes at a glance (committee-level outcomes reported May 20):

- Resolution accepting a Montgomery County Clean Energy Community grant and amending the 2025 operating budget (sponsor/second: Legislator Martin; Legislator Wilson). Outcome: approved by committee; moved to full board.

- Resolution adopting the Montgomery County multi‑jurisdictional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2024 (sponsors: Legislator Sweet; Legislator Kelly). Outcome: approved by committee; moved to full board.

- Resolution approving sale of surplus public works equipment. Outcome: approved by committee; moved to full board.

- Resolution authorizing county executive to sign a building security contract (Arrow Security) with hourly and overtime rates ($31.47/hr and $47.21/hr overtime reported) and associated fund balance transfer; committee approved and moved to full board.

- Resolution transferring ownership of a 2007 Hallmark trailer to Fulton County. Outcome: approved by committee; moved to full board.

- Resolution to amend the 2025 operating budget for insurance recovery funds; committee approved and moved to full board (administration noted funds had been received previously and credited to revenue).

- Resolution authorizing county executive to enter into contracts with school districts for school resource officer positions. Outcome: approved by committee; moved to full board.

- Multiple Health & Human Services resolutions accepting and amending carryover grant funds (lead prevention and related grants), and cooperative agreements between Social Services and the Sheriff’s Office and DPW for personnel and transport services; all were approved by the committee and moved to the full board.

- Personnel committee resolutions: establishing on‑call pay for district attorney attorneys (committee approved), establishing a sign‑on bonus policy and related salary adjustments for the first assistant district attorney and a supervising social services attorney (committee approved), and adjustments for law‑school intern pay and retirement‑day crediting for elected/appointed officials; all advanced to the full board.

- Budget & Finance committee: dispersal of mortgage tax money and approval of abstracts of audited claims; both approved and moved to full board.

Most committee approvals were recorded as voice votes in the transcript (chair asked “All in favor?” and committee members responded “Aye”). Where amendments or accounting clarifications were discussed (for example, the EMS building resolution and the EMS capital accounting lines), committee members directed staff to clarify transfer lines before full‑board consideration.

Committee votes were generally recorded in the transcript as committee approvals and transfers to the full board; explicit roll‑call tallies were not provided in the transcript excerpts.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","MONTGOMERY COUNTY LEGISLATIVE MEETING: MAY 20, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Multiple committee resolutions were approved at the committee level and sent to the full Montgomery County Legislature for final action, including routine transfers, contracts, interdepartmental cooperative agreements and grant acceptances.","taxTitle","Montgomery County, New York","taxId",69377,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6535098,"Legislature discusses executive‑legislative committee for county buildings and strategic space planning",328,130000,458000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3426126-f9a683395500a4e6e4b74b2e6117cec8&start=130&end=458","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3426126-f9a683395500a4e6e4b74b2e6117cec8/thumbnail_130000.jpg","/articles/6535098/Montgomery-County/New-York/Legislature-discusses-executivelegislative-committee-for-county-buildings-and-strategic-space-planning","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6535098-d173500a9e65f7cf37ec65af50d5645a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775971772&Signature=FkA09OIcvIm~BUo0595b0nAzEIg7tqLSeUDvz6sZ4F1KHXu~t9RNINs7d8rvpjf1jCjrljKze0ZRMF~EjAISmImdiOorK-1QIx6JOp56VfiOjQ2ZmRmjOUIeBuJ2DBh9~UK1mQeyuNzPNhClLW3gpVPCYF1k~CmV7w4i8Us2vBLKIjr~uV-LAr4IFaJEMbFqCDVjGZARziAsdneWOJ5GiZBkaoMFkS1pcn15gbvOOQ3Sdu8TAJG3wq-uN7UwsAEhq4ZlV6LTEb5l4T2cxF~ca5MN9Zxlh8VMQCWGPrsj2sOiYuH9ddj-1WrZYm9SNUc-f7KDDV967MXZpNKTGbOXTw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","During the May 20 physical services committee meeting, a legislator proposed creating a standing executive‑legislative committee to coordinate strategic planning and decisions about use of county buildings and grounds.

The proposal described a committee composed of the county executive and executive staff (including DPW and personnel), the chairman of the legislature, the chair of the physical services committee and two at‑large legislators. The speaker said the two at‑large legislative seats should be senior members familiar with county property, naming Legislators Sweet and Hedwell as the preferred two at‑large members. The speaker emphasized the committee would focus on “big picture” strategic decisions — not daily departmental management — and would meet as needed when substantial moves or space reassignments were being considered.

The speaker said meetings should be documented (the clerk or a designated note‑taker would record minutes) and that the committee’s decisions would aim to transcend personnel changes to create continuity between the administration and legislature. The county executive responded, “I would agree… I think it’s much needed,” and said the executive’s office would set up the committee and call meetings as necessary.

No formal vote was recorded on establishing the committee during the physical services meeting; the item was presented for discussion and committee members expressed support. The proposal’s supporters said the structure would bring coordination between the two branches of county government for building moves, space usage and related security or operational planning.","Members raised a plan to establish an executive‑level committee with legislative representation to coordinate long‑term use of county buildings and to formalize documentation of meetings and decisions.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6535103,"Committee approves contracts for new Montgomery County EMS building; sheriff seeks $370,044 from fund balance",1734,655000,2389000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3426126-f9a683395500a4e6e4b74b2e6117cec8&start=655&end=2389","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3426126-f9a683395500a4e6e4b74b2e6117cec8/thumbnail_655000.jpg","/articles/6535103/Montgomery-County/New-York/Committee-approves-contracts-for-new-Montgomery-County-EMS-building-sheriff-seeks-370044-from-fund-balance","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6535103-30642ae41a6eefb7a10aecd98844cd20/orig.mp4?Expires=1775971772&Signature=mPz7~ehlPKC~hhEudwIExCbDmIlfocMll2Oz6Ea6x6bqW4sn03K-1rowJP4XXsIfxSM4DClPh91S4koyz924i9rv0HY5fHnZto7DeTDx3Ncgcf1-mSt-PcHWaFL1o2vmwBb0VbMeEgd~FYptalq~ZC~gv658~NDvo2KmZHHxRw0kzvutQdpAj~YOyYmlGJ~mMx6peIoi6kugIY-xPX0hI6dmqO3aWa5yA10d-ifip0e08nRZn4u58ZNIapaoXD3VQMi3PBL5YECtjmwmaKJCOLdDaRl24Ro5vRwZ~SwHcDhCyo4lP-NC5OXIbJz87sQtIEFkYSjqwAbpiZODKbWaog__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Montgomery County public safety committee on May 20 approved a resolution authorizing the county executive to execute contracts for construction of a new county-run EMS building and garage and advanced the item to the full legislature for final approval.

The committee heard a presentation from the sheriff outlining operational and financial details for the county's EMS program and the facility. The sheriff said the county has identified “a critical issue, lack of available ambulances and frequent delayed EMS responses,” and described a multi-year effort to create an in‑county EMS capability, including procurement of ambulances and establishing billing for EMS responses.

The sheriff told the committee the county adopted an initial EMS operating budget of $533,447 for the program’s first year and that billing-based revenue began in June 2024. He reported year‑to‑date billing receivables of $591,332.01 that have been billed but not yet collected and said the program had roughly 800 responses as of February 2025 that represented cases of “no ambulance, extremely delayed response, or not the proper level of care.” He added the sheriff’s office returned approximately $405,000 to the fund balance at the end of its 2024 budget year because of vacancies and unspent personnel lines.

On facility funding, the sheriff said the county received a federal grant from Congresswoman Elise Stefanik’s office (described in committee as $1,570,000) to buy EMS equipment and to build the EMS house and garage. After procurement and expenditures (reported as $666,906.18 to date for ambulances, equipment, engineering and related costs), the low construction bid for the building and garage was reported at $1,360,044. Committee materials and the sheriff identified a funding gap of $480,044. The sheriff said he would return $110,000 that had been previously approved for other capital projects and requested $370,044 from fund balance to close the gap and proceed to construction.

The sheriff emphasized service goals as well as revenue prospects. “We’re not in this business to collect revenue. We’re in the business to provide a valuable service to the constituents who need help,” he said, while also noting billing can offset costs and that the county’s year‑to‑date revenue performance has improved since billing began.

Committee members pressed staff on billing details. The sheriff and EMR billing representatives described the payer mix (including Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance), coding challenges mapping prehospital conditions to ICD‑10 diagnosis codes, and the county’s partnership with a collections agency that specializes in EMS revenue recovery. The sheriff said some payments have been routed incorrectly to other county accounts because of multiple NPI numbers tied to the county tax ID and that staff are working to reconcile remittances so the sheriff’s office is credited correctly.

The sheriff also said the EMS program had saved the county about $25,000 by using county ambulances for jail transports and volunteer fire service standbys, and that DPW will perform site preparation if the legislature approves construction funding.

Committee members asked about alternatives, timing and budget oversight. The sheriff said remaining grant funds for the facility were available and that delaying construction could increase future costs. Treasurer Sean Graham and county budget staff clarified accounting language and transfer lines as the committee worked through amendments to add $40,000 to the C.T. Male line and $65,000 to a Westwinds general construction line (a combined additional $105,000 to be included in the total transfer from fund balance).

After discussion and several technical amendments to the resolution text and funding lines, the committee voted to approve the resolution at the committee level and move it to the full legislature for final action.

The committee did not adopt a final dollar amount for the full board at the committee meeting; the sheriff framed the $370,044 fund‑balance request as the amount needed after returning the previously approved $110,000 capital allocation and applying remaining grant funds and previously incurred expenses.","The public safety committee approved a resolution to authorize contracts for construction of a new county EMS building and garage and advanced the request for $370,044 from fund balance to fill a remaining funding gap after federal grant proceeds and prior spending were tallied.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Montgomery County committee actions advanced to full legislature on May 20

Legislature discusses executive‑legislative committee for county buildings and strategic space planning

Committee approves contracts for new Montgomery County EMS building; sheriff seeks $370,044 from fund balance