The MSAD 51 School Board meeting on April 1, 2024, highlighted significant community concerns regarding the proposed new elementary school and the controversial artificial turf field. Residents expressed strong opposition to linking these two projects in a single referendum, fearing that the turf proposal could jeopardize support for the much-needed school.

Lehi Morozini, a Cumberland resident, raised alarms about the health risks associated with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) found in artificial turf. Morozini emphasized the potential dangers of PFAS exposure, particularly for children, citing its links to various health issues and its ban in several regions due to toxicity. He urged the board to consider the implications of installing such materials in community spaces, especially given the elevated location of the proposed field, which could lead to runoff affecting nearby residential areas.

Melissa Gautin, another Cumberland resident, addressed the impact of lighting on local wildlife, specifically the browntail moth, urging the school board to reduce light pollution during peak activity times. Her comments underscored the interconnectedness of environmental health and community well-being.

Bruce Sherwin and Sarah Rose echoed Morozini's concerns, advocating for separate votes on the school and turf projects. Sherwin pointed out that many community members are more supportive of investing in local Little League fields rather than artificial turf, which he believes could lead to a negative outcome for the school proposal if bundled together.

The discussions at the meeting reflect a community deeply engaged in the decision-making process, weighing the benefits of educational infrastructure against environmental and health considerations. As the board moves forward, the call for clarity and separation in the voting process may shape the future of both the school and the proposed turf field, ensuring that community voices are heard in these critical decisions.