The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in Torrington on May 21, 2025, highlighted a contentious proposal regarding the expansion of the McCall House, a facility providing mental health support. Community members voiced strong opinions both in favor of and against the expansion, reflecting deep concerns about its impact on the neighborhood.
Supporters of the McCall House, including residents and board members, emphasized the positive role the facility plays in the community. Conrad Sinkowitz, a local resident and employee at McCall, praised the organization for its commitment to mental health services and the supportive environment it fosters. He noted the strong neighborhood ties and the effective communication among residents, which contribute to a sense of community.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Mary Kilmer, who owns property adjacent to the McCall House, shared her positive experiences, stating that any issues that arose were promptly addressed by the management. Other supporters echoed these sentiments, highlighting the professionalism of the staff and the overall benefits of having such a facility in the area, including improved property values.
However, opposition to the expansion was equally vocal. Residents like Jim Fabriello and Nella Stoltz raised serious concerns about safety and disturbances linked to the facility. Stoltz recounted troubling incidents involving residents of the McCall House, including inappropriate behavior and safety fears for her children. She urged the commission to consider the long-term implications of expanding a facility that she believes has already strained the neighborhood's peace.
The meeting underscored a significant divide in community sentiment regarding mental health facilities and their place in residential areas. As the commission deliberates on the proposal, the discussions reflect broader themes of community safety, support for mental health, and the challenges of integrating such services into established neighborhoods. The outcome of this proposal will likely have lasting effects on the Torrington community, shaping the dialogue around mental health services and neighborhood dynamics in the years to come.