The Arvada City Council convened on May 20, 2025, to address several key issues, including the approval of a water enterprise revenue bond and public comments regarding community support initiatives.
The meeting commenced with a discussion on the issuance of the City of Arvada's water enterprise revenue bond series 2025. Councilmember Ambrose moved to approve the ordinance, which was subsequently passed unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0, while Councilmember Pfeiffer was noted as having an excused absence. This bond issuance is significant as it reflects the city's strong AAA credit rating, which has historically attracted buyers and ensured full subscription during sales.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Following the bond discussion, the council opened the floor for public comments. One resident, Tom Ochsner, addressed the council regarding Mission Arvada, a local organization that provides essential services, including an overnight shelter for the homeless. Ochsner expressed concern over the lack of financial support from the city, specifically referencing a previous $40,000 contribution to the Severe Weather Shelter Network that was not extended to Mission Arvada. He highlighted the organization's efforts during the winter months, where they provided shelter for 277 individuals over 45 nights, at a cost of approximately $60,000.
Ochsner emphasized the importance of Mission Arvada's work and the potential impact of losing key staff members, such as their volunteer coordinator, who is leaving due to financial constraints. He urged the council to reconsider their funding approach to ensure that vital community services continue to thrive.
The meeting concluded with a recognition of the challenges faced by local organizations and the need for continued support from the city to maintain essential services for the community. The council's next steps regarding funding and support for Mission Arvada remain to be determined as they consider Ochsner's appeal.