Pacific Grove residents criticize city council's proposed pay hike amid economic concerns

The Pacific Grove City Council convened on May 21, 2025, to address several pressing issues, including a contentious proposal for a pay increase for council members amidst ongoing economic challenges facing the city. The meeting featured public comments that highlighted significant concerns regarding financial accountability and the implications of the proposed salary adjustments.

During the public comment period, one resident expressed strong opposition to the proposed pay hike, questioning the appropriateness of such an increase given the city's looming economic woes. The speaker criticized the council for what they perceived as a lack of transparency and accountability, urging that any decisions regarding compensation should be left to the voters in the next election.

Another resident, Christie Thomas, echoed these sentiments, expressing disappointment that the pay increase was included in the consent agenda without sufficient public discussion. Thomas raised alarms about the city's unfunded pension liabilities, which amount to $6 million, and criticized the council for not adequately addressing these financial challenges. She argued that the justification for the pay increase, based on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) narratives, did not align with the realities of most jobs that do not offer similar benefits.

Thomas also questioned the rationale behind providing medical benefits for part-time work, suggesting that such measures may not be fiscally or ethically sound for the community. She emphasized that local governance should prioritize the unique needs of Pacific Grove rather than automatically complying with state mandates that may not serve the city's best interests.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between council members and constituents regarding fiscal responsibility and the need for greater accountability in decision-making processes. As discussions continue, the council faces the challenge of addressing these concerns while navigating the complexities of local governance and community expectations.