During the Ogden Valley Planning Commission meeting on February 28, 2024, community members voiced strong opinions regarding the proposed Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program. The meeting, which included both in-person and virtual attendees, highlighted concerns about the transparency and fairness of the TDR process.

David Carver, a resident of Eden, expressed skepticism about the TDRs, initially mistaking them for a form of cryptocurrency. He urged caution, suggesting that the commission should not proceed without careful consideration. Carver's comments reflect a broader apprehension among residents about the implications of introducing TDRs into the local development landscape.

Jack Hartman, another resident, raised concerns about the fairness of granting development rights that were not requested during previous negotiations. Hartman, who has a background in law and government, argued that allowing developers to alter agreements retroactively undermines the integrity of the original deals. He emphasized that developers should adhere to the terms they initially agreed upon.

Kaye Hoagland, also a resident of Eden, echoed these sentiments, criticizing the lack of an open market discussion regarding the TDRs. She argued that the process appeared to favor certain parties without allowing broader community input. Hoagland highlighted the importance of fair negotiations, asserting that altering agreements post-factum is not only legally questionable but also detrimental to community trust.

The discussions at the meeting underscore a significant tension between development interests and community concerns in Ogden Valley. As the Planning Commission considers the implementation of TDRs, the feedback from residents indicates a strong desire for transparency and equitable treatment in the development process. The commission's next steps will be crucial in addressing these concerns and determining the future of development rights in the area.