The Falmouth Water Quality Management Committee convened on November 6, 2024, to discuss critical issues surrounding the widening of the inlet and its implications for local water quality and infrastructure. The meeting highlighted community concerns about the ongoing project, particularly regarding the costs and potential impacts on properties near the inlet.
During the session, committee members and residents expressed their support for the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and acknowledged the collaborative efforts that led to the current project plans. However, significant concerns were raised about the decision to widen the inlet, with some residents questioning the necessity and financial implications of the project.
One resident, Anne Cloud, voiced her opposition to the widening, emphasizing the need for clarity on the costs associated with Innovative Alternative (IA) systems for affected homes. She urged the committee to consider the financial burden on residents and suggested that the project could exceed initial budget estimates, potentially reaching $15 million. Cloud also raised concerns about the bridge's elevation, arguing that it should be reconsidered to prevent flooding during storms.
Another resident, Leigh Decoto, highlighted the erosion risks to her properties and expressed frustration over the lack of dredging in recent years, which she believes is essential for maintaining water quality. Decoto and others emphasized the importance of understanding the environmental impacts of the project, particularly how changes to the inlet could affect local ecosystems.
Committee members responded to these concerns by outlining the project's goals, which include enhancing the resiliency of the beach and restoring dunes to mitigate erosion. They acknowledged the challenges posed by flooding and the limitations of elevating roads in the area.
The meeting concluded with a commitment from committee members to provide updated cost estimates and further information on the dredging schedule. The discussions underscored the community's desire for transparency and collaboration as the project moves forward, balancing infrastructure improvements with environmental stewardship.