In a recent meeting of the El Paso County Board of County Commissioners, significant concerns were raised regarding the appointment process for the Pikes Peak Library District Board of Trustees. Community members voiced strong objections to the proposed appointment of Kenny Kenayuki, highlighting issues of transparency, accountability, and qualifications.
Lisa Bigelow, a local resident, opened the discussion by criticizing the appointment process, which she described as inefficient and lacking public involvement. She expressed disappointment that the interviews for the seven finalists were not conducted in a manner that allowed for comprehensive public engagement. Bigelow emphasized that the library district is currently facing leadership challenges and that Kenayuki, despite his military experience, does not possess the necessary qualifications or familiarity with the community to effectively serve on the board.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Carla Powers echoed these sentiments, raising concerns about Kenayuki's lack of financial expertise and board experience. She pointed out that while he proposed expanding the library's maker space program, the immediate need should be fiscal responsibility and understanding of the library's financial framework. Powers urged the commissioners to reconsider the appointment, suggesting that other candidates had stronger qualifications.
Catherine Chukas also contributed to the discussion, stressing the importance of having qualified individuals on the library board, especially given that 30% of the county's tax mills are allocated to the library. She criticized the limited interviews conducted for the finalists and called for a more thorough vetting process to ensure that board members are equipped to handle the unique financial laws governing Colorado's public institutions.
The meeting underscored a growing frustration among community members regarding the lack of transparency in the appointment process and the perceived inadequacies of the proposed candidate. As residents continue to advocate for accountability and better representation, the board faces pressure to address these concerns and ensure that future appointments reflect the community's needs and expectations. The commissioners are expected to deliberate on the appointment in the coming weeks, with community members pledging to remain engaged in the process.