Senate panel questions DDC nominee on lengthy title 5 permit approval in Orange County

The Joint Senate Standing Committee Meeting held on May 27, 2025, focused on critical environmental issues, particularly the management of industrial sites and the ongoing deliberations surrounding the Competitive Power Ventures (CPV) natural gas power plant in Orange County, often referred to as the Prococo plant.

The meeting commenced with discussions on the State Superfund program, which was highlighted as a vital component of the state budget. Legislators expressed enthusiasm for utilizing the Superfund alongside ground cleanup initiatives to repurpose former industrial sites for future development. A key point raised was the importance of minimizing environmental impact while promoting industrial growth, particularly in areas with existing brownfields and closed landfills.

Senator Scoofus initiated a detailed inquiry into the CPV plant, questioning the lengthy seven-year review process for its Title 5 permit by the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). He referenced past allegations of political influence in the plant's approval process, emphasizing the need for transparency and integrity in governmental decision-making. The acting commissioner of the DEC acknowledged the importance of maintaining a transparent process but noted that he was not familiar with the specific conversations referenced by the senator.

The senator further pressed on the implications of the plant's operation, particularly in relation to environmental justice, as the adjacent city of Middletown is classified as a disadvantaged community with a median household income below $40,000. He highlighted that this would be the third Title 5 permit considered since the enactment of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote renewable energy.

The acting commissioner reiterated his commitment to ensuring that all projects undergo thorough analysis in line with the CLCPA's goals. However, he refrained from commenting on the specifics of the CPV permit application, stating that the department was still reviewing public comments and coordinating with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

As the meeting progressed, concerns were raised about the timing of the DEC's decision-making process, particularly in light of the upcoming nomination of the acting commissioner. Senators expressed frustration over the lack of clarity regarding the permit's status and its potential impact on the community.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the ongoing tension between energy development and environmental protection, with legislators advocating for responsible decision-making that prioritizes community welfare and environmental integrity. The committee plans to continue monitoring the situation as the DEC moves closer to a decision on the CPV plant's permit.