The Saratoga Design Review Commission convened on May 28, 2025, to discuss a proposed three-story building that has sparked significant community interest and concern. The project, located near residential neighborhoods, aims to provide office and amenity space but has raised questions about its height and design compatibility with the surrounding area.
Commission members expressed a range of opinions on the building's mass and scale. Mr. Wood, a commission member, noted he had no concerns about the project's appearance, while others emphasized the importance of ensuring the design aligns with the architectural standards of the district. Mr. Grit Savage highlighted the need for the building to present an appealing facade, especially since it is situated on a gateway corridor. He suggested that the design should focus on aesthetics, as it would be the most visible aspect for pedestrians.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The discussion also touched on the materials proposed for the building. Several members expressed support for using durable materials, such as cement board panels, which have shown better longevity compared to vinyl. Concerns were raised about the potential impact of the building on the residential character of the neighborhood, particularly regarding the loss of green space and the height of the structure.
Public comments reflected strong opposition from nearby residents. Many voiced worries that the three-story building would overwhelm the existing single-family homes, disrupt the neighborhood's character, and lead to increased traffic and noise. Residents emphasized the importance of preserving the wooded areas and expressed fears about the potential loss of property value due to the new construction.
The commission acknowledged the community's concerns and encouraged residents to participate in future planning board meetings, where broader issues such as traffic management and site elevation would be addressed. The commission also considered the possibility of requesting additional design perspectives to better understand how the building would fit within the neighborhood context.
As the meeting concluded, it was clear that while the design review focused on aesthetics, the community's apprehensions about the project's impact on their quality of life would continue to shape the conversation as the proposal moves forward. The commission's next steps will involve further discussions with the applicant to explore potential modifications that could alleviate some of the community's concerns.