Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Utah Senate approves clarity on attorney roles and public record definitions

February 23, 2024 | 2024 Utah Legislature, Utah Legislature, Utah Legislative Branch, Utah



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Utah Senate approves clarity on attorney roles and public record definitions
The Utah Senate convened on February 23, 2024, to discuss several legislative bills, with a focus on clarifying the roles of mortgage professionals and attorneys, as well as amendments to the Government Records Access and Management Act.

One of the key discussions centered around Senate Bill 234, which aims to delineate the responsibilities of mortgage professionals and attorneys. The bill clarifies that when providing legal counsel, attorneys must adhere to attorney rules, while mortgage professionals must follow their specific duties. The bill received strong support, passing with 22 votes in favor and no opposition.

Another significant topic was the First Substitute Senate Bill 240, which proposed amendments to the Government Records Access and Management Act. Senator Bramble moved to circle the bill, indicating further discussion is needed before a vote. The bill seeks to allow a prevailing party to recover attorney's fees if a record request is denied and aims to clarify the definition of public records, specifically regarding daily calendars. This clarification is intended to reinforce the long-standing policy that personal notes and daily calendars are not considered public records, countering a recent ruling by the state records committee that contradicted this understanding.

Senator Harper introduced First Substitute Senate Bill 235, which also faced a motion to circle for further review. This bill is expected to undergo additional amendments, particularly concerning the definition of public records in relation to appointment calendars.

The discussions highlighted the ongoing efforts to refine legislative definitions and ensure transparency in government records while balancing the roles of various professionals in the legal and mortgage sectors. The Senate plans to revisit these bills in future sessions for further deliberation and potential amendments.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI