Charlton planning board debates apartment units on L Stevens Road and traffic concerns

In the heart of Charlton, Massachusetts, the Planning Board convened on May 21, 2025, to discuss a proposed development that has stirred significant community concern. As the meeting unfolded, residents voiced their apprehensions about the impact of new apartment units on their neighborhood, particularly regarding visibility, traffic safety, and the overall character of the area.

The proposed development, which includes multiple apartment units, has raised eyebrows due to its height and proximity to existing homes. One resident expressed deep concern about the visual impact, stating, “She’s gonna now see apartments, and that’s a huge detriment.” The discussion quickly shifted to potential solutions for visual mitigation, with suggestions for trees and fencing to create a buffer between the new units and neighboring properties.

Traffic safety emerged as a critical issue during the meeting. Residents highlighted the dangers of the existing road conditions, particularly at the intersection of L Stevens Road and North Main Street. One resident passionately described the challenges of navigating the area, citing speeding vehicles and blind spots that make turning onto North Main Street perilous. “You really can’t take a right turn down,” they lamented, urging the board to consider traffic lights and a comprehensive traffic study to address these concerns.

The board members acknowledged the need for careful planning, with discussions about potentially adjusting the layout of the development to improve traffic flow and safety. Suggestions included reducing the number of units and reconfiguring driveways to enhance visibility for drivers and pedestrians alike.

As the meeting progressed, the conversation turned to the nature of the proposed units. While the developer indicated that the apartments would initially be rentals, concerns were raised about the long-term implications for the community. Residents worried that transient renters might not invest in the town as homeowners would, questioning the overall benefit of the development to Charlton’s growth and character.

Despite the developer’s assurances of responsible management and a commitment to community engagement, skepticism lingered among residents. “I have a lot of hesitations,” one neighbor remarked, reflecting a broader sentiment of distrust stemming from past missteps in the development process.

As the meeting concluded, the Planning Board faced the challenge of balancing the needs of developers with the concerns of residents. The discussions highlighted the complexities of urban planning in a growing community, where the desire for development must be weighed against the preservation of neighborhood integrity and safety. With further evaluations and community input expected, the future of this development remains uncertain, leaving residents eager for a resolution that respects both their concerns and the town’s growth ambitions.