[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6223012,"mediaKeyId","3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af","parentId",3577279,"title","Commissioners approve civil plans for Campbell Tiny Home Park after water issues resolved with Malloy Water","audioSeconds",133,"startMs",2946000,"endMs",3079000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af&start=2946&end=3079","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af/thumbnail_2946000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6223012/Hunt-County/Texas/Commissioners-approve-civil-plans-for-Campbell-Tiny-Home-Park-after-water-issues-resolved-with-Malloy-Water","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6223012-5f19c81dfdeb3d75d1d03dad6117d7f1/orig.mp4?Expires=1773646423&Signature=A5jzyedyp-H8rL-WuE7XMli6ow9oMgUeQFy-ACR1dax1uHBeugn4xzqtEsuA2ZmiOwZU7FkT3SCAMdR95SMTs0D1WOq9csoRwWj0I~-0tuRMt~AOE9uyfuFbYFNHBrD4n0c~dpQ940L3-QyBxKwfPwJu88HgO0N4518Qxu4sFLZJtt78pB-Qc7ym65rnRzPAGcENegzLGViLNMw2D2cj3juUt9XUtPdUtmnwZzR8wg85HFpaxkKUYKp24D3tK1TFI5M1OeNNvDe0zBYOhrhiQ1HB-tiLm5z18lAmXwjAwxn7G5dEP2TXrnm6eV7NHqX8rqZjKgJaIpdwBQ4~nOq1zA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Hunt County, TX","date","2025-05-29T08:43:54.95Z","article","The Hunt County Commissioners Court approved civil plans for the Campbell Tiny Home Park on May 27, 2025, after the developer and county engineers resolved earlier water‑service issues with Malloy Water, a small local water provider.

County staff reported the developer and engineers had addressed required specifications and water concerns. The developer initially explored well water but encountered issues with the well driller; the developer then reached agreement with Malloy Water to provide upgraded lines and service, staff said.

One commissioner said he \"reluctantly\" approved the project and expressed a policy concern that the county’s authority limits the court’s ability to reject tiny home parks near higher‑end residential areas. \"This is one of them where I wish our legislators would give us a little more authority,\" the commissioner said, but he moved to approve and the court adopted the civil plans by voice vote.

No conditions beyond standard engineering compliance were attached to the approval at the meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Commissioners Court Regular Session","oneSentenceSummary","The court approved civil plans for the Campbell Tiny Home Park in Precinct 4 after the developer resolved water supply concerns with Malloy Water; one commissioner expressed reservations about tiny home parks near higher‑end neighborhoods but voted to approve.","taxTitle","Hunt County, Texas","taxId",51030,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6223017,"Commissioners discuss family‑to‑family property split on FM 118, ask applicants to rework frontage options",555,2341000,2896000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af&start=2341&end=2896","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af/thumbnail_2341000.jpg","/articles/6223017/Hunt-County/Texas/Commissioners-discuss-familytofamily-property-split-on-FM-118-ask-applicants-to-rework-frontage-options","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6223017-f40281eee18c3f79badf034aa1042e9e/orig.mp4?Expires=1773646423&Signature=OWpNmAQJgFg~D4pYu~GPcmFTESDKVEutmVtsjTC-Ik1499MV6JIjc1BDMRFkzg54NSxnXPopBh0uc7NulMHYGuwB8GCbf3VJheCHIy266d4uOWwCLXWgR3IBVDZ6Yk~uswwk8TbaiXbij7Z8TR4bquegdG9UNsA-Usz6qPQqJ3FtDYp6GZEMY5kk2wqurVNID9xHLdNmCa-uiV-BGKhyzjoe5N0wjcgFKd7hcuA5U0XhcK8uhvVRnxvNs7dQ1wuBQspfX08rEuyvuEevzh-mW8-q0pr1zvDTp23WHSMRXejNlJPx8oc3t-vvXX6lSAJ6aPPW3mlItLGy4fOLEq-5AQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A requested variance to allow a family division on FM 118 in northern Hunt County was discussed May 27, 2025, and the court asked the applicants and county staff to explore alternative lot configurations or an access easement before returning the item.

County planner Brian presented the request, which would create an approximately 1.5‑acre parcel from a larger tract. The proposed parcel would fall short of the subdivision regulation frontage requirement for the retained 8‑acre tract; Brian said the new parcel would be \"shy about 25 feet\" of the required frontage under county subdivision rules and would leave a narrow frontage of about 60 feet on the proposed lot.

Brian and court members discussed options including using an easement across the daughter's existing driveway for access and reconfiguring the parcel to increase the frontage. The planner said a family‑to‑family transfer does not require a subdivision plat now, but any future sale of the 1.5‑acre parcel would require platting and protection of access.

Applicant Steven Mac Maccabee and his wife Tammy told the court they are \"more than willing to do whatever is necessary to, appease the court to to to make this work,\" including providing easements and coordinating septic and access needs.

The court asked staff to work with the applicants to reconfigure the division in a way that better meets frontage standards and to return the item at the next meeting.","A variance request for a family division on FM 118 that would leave the new lot with about 60 feet of frontage was discussed; the applicants agreed to work with county staff to reconfigure the split or secure easements and the court moved the item to the next meeting.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6223022,"Precinct foreman proposes allowing polyethylene culverts, new permit and inspection process; court moves item to old business",461,1689000,2150000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af&start=1689&end=2150","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af/thumbnail_1689000.jpg","/articles/6223022/Hunt-County/Texas/Precinct-foreman-proposes-allowing-polyethylene-culverts-new-permit-and-inspection-process-court-moves-item-to-old-business","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6223022-0d46998b9cced1456a6e61c6396a7bef/orig.mp4?Expires=1773646423&Signature=Kdh7e-6LPi78TDaFsU6iiBczI4WI0GgIen-vekylGUkhKcVPVFoYQ8iOZo6slT~4XGxJLYMfFwB6DssvFtPfr28~kRecM1WFTlaTmSHuQ9PzWQsY5u9VuVk~lbEn8xwSGmRTDUi06oMrTwkIgXRccdBHCmkV5OlToNwqp2IZcKKEXgx5alle4D0WTObE-v6R8pUz5XIFsXX~huBOZ8DuO-grGFoxE8fRJb8CFHbKG14ugOWznR0nNjpJWvibGZkhkFr4rptpH5mrTt4vDmj9Ira5MbSwwFkaUfkNISGvQXU2z79dqMg9wlI8kJ4IUEeVFcWKLld0uf17DyUCMXLjEg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","David, a road department foreman, asked Commissioners Court to permit polyethylene culverts as an option in addition to galvanized steel and to strengthen the county's culvert permitting and inspection process.

David told the court that polyethylene culverts have a life expectancy of 50 to 100 years compared with 20 to 40 years for steel and that 15‑ and 18‑inch polyethylene pipe is about \"$200 a little over $200 cheaper\" per unit than comparable steel. He said polyethylene pipe is lighter, sometimes movable by hand, does not require banding when joined, has a double‑wall design with a smooth inner wall and ribbed outer wall that resists clogging, and that polyethylene culverts are DOT‑approved when installed correctly.

David proposed a procedural change requiring applicants to receive written installation specifications when they apply for a culvert permit, require the precinct authority to size the culvert, and require a post‑installation inspection. If an installation fails inspection, an owner would have 30 days to correct the problem or the county would remove and store the culvert at the owner’s expense.

He also suggested requiring polyethylene culverts under concrete driveways because steel culverts under concrete tend to rot and are difficult and expensive to replace. David advised a minimum cover of 6 inches over the culvert and installation to be below the ditch line and parallel to ditch flow.

Commissioners generally agreed the material and procedural changes deserved further study. One commissioner said a recent subdivision experience supported polyethylene culverts for cost and longevity; others discussed whether the county should install culverts directly to ensure correct installation, and noted tradeoffs for road crews. The court moved the proposal to old business for further development.","A precinct road foreman proposed permitting polyethylene culverts alongside galvanized steel, citing lower cost, longer life and DOT approval, and suggested changes to culvert permit inspections and enforcement; the court agreed to refine the proposal and return it as old business.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6223027,"Commissioners table contract for on‑demand translation service, ask for budget source and jail impact review",730,921000,1651000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af&start=921&end=1651","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af/thumbnail_921000.jpg","/articles/6223027/Hunt-County/Texas/Commissioners-table-contract-for-ondemand-translation-service-ask-for-budget-source-and-jail-impact-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6223027-e1ad919ae46620c4a26269b342b764ee/orig.mp4?Expires=1773646423&Signature=mflI63E2TUV9ECPuk7QN5-FiQxlLdmVc5x78CpKuRfnSmWldd1RsL-sCytHG3zKjOeUQbk72QN3ZTsyIbwKT9J56vz78I7ABuR9QY6ewlPRJLkdJAOr9EUDAjVgs-sACMz7xbdUCp2hbRp4oHiv-KpA7oqKqmAfO46D9aBq07lcgW4ZOGmoJqgxJWj2ircd0mJjuus3ngwAkl2cNkBpn~S31Dqftq42e5FnoiYxLQefDBS3fNLhOuCT7tfFdDxFagmLjKLGDkEUS-7QUasw1NtaJt1LQsMwC3jvMqVwNbdfpaoNxpMcbytwyZcDcczlS5CGZkI~kcl4XbwM3NobwzQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Hunt County Commissioners Court discussed but did not approve a proposed contract with Genie Enterprises for on‑demand translation services on May 27, 2025. The court instructed staff to determine how the service would be paid for and to return the item under old business.

Joel, who presented the proposal, told the court that Genie offers remote interpretation in more than 300 languages and American Sign Language and charges by usage — for Spanish, he said, about \"80 or 85¢ a minute.\" He described Genie as an on‑demand option to fill gaps when certified translators are unavailable or cost‑prohibitive for short, unscheduled interactions.

Joel said the service could be used by courts, law enforcement and other county departments and that departments could be assigned individual logins so usage would be auditable. \"You can use it anytime,\" he said, describing phone and video access and the ability to schedule interpreters ahead of time. He also noted that Genie does not currently provide post‑event transcripts but is reportedly developing that feature.

Judges present explained limits on when remote or contract interpreters can be used. Joel and Judge Cruz said the Office of Court Administration (OCA) provides free, certified interpreters in some noncontested court matters such as pleas and resetting cases, but licensed translators are required in contested matters and final dispositions. Joel said Genie would reduce reliance on costly, scheduled certified interpreters when immediate interpretation is needed for attorney‑client conversations or magistrations.

Commissioners raised budget questions and asked whether existing county contracts — including the jail’s current vendor, Voyance — would be discontinued. The sheriff’s office representative said Voyance usage is minimal and billed from the jail commissary account; he and other officials said the county needs more information about how the service would be funded and whether the jail or other departments would keep their current providers.

After discussion about anticipated usage and a suggestion to review costs after a quarter of service, the court voted to table the contract and asked staff to determine the appropriate funding source and how usage would be allocated and billed. \"We'll table this till next time. We'll put it under old business,\" Judge Stovall said.","The court discussed a proposed on‑demand translation contract with Genie Enterprises, raised questions about costs, certification limits for court use and jail procurement, and voted to table the item for further review of funding and jail needs.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6223032,"Hunt County approves replacement sheriff vehicles, contingent on accounting change and auditor review",183,208000,391000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af&start=208&end=391","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3577279-488aee3a1fb5357727d1b8f0b2de75af/thumbnail_208000.jpg","/articles/6223032/Hunt-County/Texas/Hunt-County-approves-replacement-sheriff-vehicles-contingent-on-accounting-change-and-auditor-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6223032-8ddbf7316708301d32789b1fced74f4e/orig.mp4?Expires=1773646423&Signature=fwZ~nOt72LZY6FzbRFgMsR0XBC-rpAQaLEvOzy1Nag0-IyxQISjsYO5tqeC3tWsdT3hQNfK-Kp9aoshp-DWfN6U2ZlRM6ubBZJEik1xGXXWiZ6-zhYW-hRwaF4V1UUeCXEd~~MzJD4w~aXBnvsyppNc4ql4jdJpf2FseY1SSYVeyouJd5zGPZWLGy3aNuoYUR5mJjPF4rCgBc3EJGW6SG7VOb6Dj8OEWmdVhOPdUK1Dod24OFDvuUwnqhzykPxM~-N2F9OXjtXv66hDYo2iGpMfyOEH~ZsMqvuiZUhSrLbEYFrmfop24l1hBz3cCmuHCw2mZ2E8kOu4EFfvH4y7iYA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Hunt County Commissioners Court approved the purchase of replacement vehicles for several precincts, the sheriff’s office and county facilities on May 27, 2025, but made the approvals contingent on correcting accounting line-item codes and resolving questions from the county auditor.

The court approved consent items 4–7 with a condition that the line-item numbers be changed so the last four digits read \"4200\" and that the auditor be satisfied that the lease and maintenance charges are properly recorded. Judge Stovall described the motion and the court adopted it after a second and voice vote.

The order continues the county’s multiyear fleet plan that Judge Stovall said began about five years ago with Enterprise Fleet Management. \"We adopted a plan with the Enterprise Vehicles approximately 4 or 5 years ago,\" Stovall said, explaining the county had an average vehicle age of \"18 and a half years\" before the plan. He said Enterprise manages fleet maintenance, tracks mileage and helps preserve resale value when vehicles are sold.

Stovall explained that some sheriff’s units are excluded from the company maintenance program because of the higher wear from emergency use. He said vehicles identified for replacement in the first four-year lease cycle are being rotated out before they reach zero resale value and that past sale proceeds have sometimes been credited against lease payments or returned to the general fund. \"Most of those vehicles have been selling from 10 to $20,000,\" he said.

The court also discussed downsizing some facilities vehicles — for example replacing large vans with 3/4- or 1/2-ton trucks or smaller pickups and buying lighter vehicles for routine maintenance work to save fuel and right-size department fleets. Stovall said the budget already anticipates sale proceeds and that the replacements should not create a large new budget impact.

Commissioners asked for clarification about whether maintenance costs were bundled into leases or billed separately. Stovall said maintenance is managed and billed through the lease arrangement so that routine service, oil changes and tire rotations are handled and tracked by the vendor.

The court flagged that some purchases would be made using SB22 funds — a state grant program for small counties — and noted those SB22-funded sheriff vehicles have restrictions attached. Stovall said SB22 has historically applied to counties under a 300,000 population threshold and that legislative proposals may shift that threshold, but he did not give a firm statutory citation.

The approvals will proceed once the auditor’s questions are resolved and the line-item coding is corrected; no additional policy change was adopted at the meeting.","The Hunt County Commissioners Court approved replacement vehicles for multiple precincts and county departments, including sheriff's office units funded by SB22, contingent on a correction to line-item coding and satisfaction of auditor questions.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commissioners approve civil plans for Campbell Tiny Home Park after water issues resolved with Malloy Water

Commissioners discuss family‑to‑family property split on FM 118, ask applicants to rework frontage options

Precinct foreman proposes allowing polyethylene culverts, new permit and inspection process; court moves item to old business

Commissioners table contract for on‑demand translation service, ask for budget source and jail impact review

Hunt County approves replacement sheriff vehicles, contingent on accounting change and auditor review