[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6222536,"mediaKeyId","3593460-2a0ca4f3bdf8eb02fa4951c1de42d612","parentId",3593460,"title","House passes measure to tighten corporate practice‑of‑medicine rules, limit MSO control","audioSeconds",1536,"startMs",8940000,"endMs",10476000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3593460-2a0ca4f3bdf8eb02fa4951c1de42d612&start=8940&end=10476","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3593460-2a0ca4f3bdf8eb02fa4951c1de42d612/thumbnail_8940000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6222536/Oregon/House-passes-measure-to-tighten-corporate-practiceofmedicine-rules-limit-MSO-control","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6222536-3678e05cc73b618cdf6f875151d138c4/orig.mp4?Expires=1771078200&Signature=STSdksfg~fok6sSVZMca-UKgfZlDPNHy2jYhZ65fRs2qTX7CZFI33~q~ITuVKXneA5nNvfA-uOKS-3aIAK86uCSGKw6qGCybwpQXPJsbbfelxmk7mWEwy5Xgl6Vndt4VaTKM9jC4SlsmnExnpGt02RhFKPVURaI0NZsMfXjE9rKQBe0n9gEsM2m7iEIuiQJFtffHjS1zru9OmVvY93~TzXuu~v8M69q3ZWhA5qyr-d~XJyy7M9cq8MBmmzLph6Ch4xG6mLvrC9zFX9SLkLGGO30LiF~m8d6xqO8mJazg-0JMAdOfXoHKmIgwyoDzG9zBjJoeXdSd7NRprD3KFNoGHA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Oregon Legislature","date","2025-05-28T00:00:00Z","article","The Oregon House of Representatives passed Senate Bill 9 51 A on May 28, 2025, a measure intended to strengthen the state's corporate practice of medicine doctrine by limiting the ability of management service organizations and outside investors to exert control over clinical decisions.

Sponsor Representative Ben Bowman said the bill responds to a decades‑old trend of clinic purchases and to tactics that allow corporate purchasers to exercise control while appearing to meet the letter of Oregon law. \"This bill is based on a simple principle: That medical decisions should be made by medical professionals,\" Bowman said on the floor.

The sponsor and supporters said the bill preserves lawful outside investment in health care but draws clearer lines around operational arrangements that could override physician judgment. Among the floor explanations: the bill clarifies ownership and employment arrangements, curtails certain noncompete and stock‑transfer restrictions used to limit physician autonomy, and bans dual‑employment structures that critics describe as captive or friendly physician models.

Backers argued the changes will protect patient care and local access. Representative Laura Davide, who supported the bill, described the historical stakes: \"The point is, medicine wasn't always a trusted profession,\" and said regulatory controls are needed to preserve trust and clinical independence. Several members described local examples in which consolidation had led to provider departures, service reductions or longer patient waits.

Opponents warned the language as written could limit useful administrative support and investment models that sustain clinics, especially in rural or underserved areas. Representative Derek Deal said he supported the intent but worried the bill \"goes too far and, in my opinion, will have serious unintended consequences,\" and called for narrower, enforceable language that separates clinical control from administrative services.

During floor process the House suspended the section‑by‑section reading requirement for the bill and then advanced SB 951 A to final passage. The clerk later announced the bill \"having received the constitutional majority, is declared passed.\" Supporters said the final language in the bill strikes a balance between investment and physician autonomy; critics urged further work to ensure access in rural and lower‑margin markets.

The bill drew bipartisan discussion and multiple floor speakers who recounted local impacts after private equity or insurer purchases of long‑standing clinics. Supporters pointed to endorsements from state professional associations and to previous bipartisan efforts and work groups that shaped the measure. Opponents urged clarifying amendments, exemptions for certain models, and legal protections for providers who had entered lawful contracts prior to the bill's passage.

The bill will move forward through the legislative process after passage by the House; proponents said the intent is to preserve physician decision‑making and patient‑centered care while allowing non‑clinical investment and support services to continue under clearer boundaries.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","House Chamber Convenes 05/28/2025 10:30 AM","oneSentenceSummary","Senate Bill 951 A passed the Oregon House on May 28, 2025, to reinforce physician control over clinical decisions, restrict certain contracting practices and curb management‑services loopholes that allow outside investors to influence care.","taxTitle","House of Representatives, Committees, Legislative, Oregon","taxId",17188,"location","Oregon","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6222539,"Oregon House approves joint‑liability bill aimed at unpaid construction wages",6935,1990000,8925000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3593460-2a0ca4f3bdf8eb02fa4951c1de42d612&start=1990&end=8925","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3593460-2a0ca4f3bdf8eb02fa4951c1de42d612/thumbnail_1990000.jpg","/articles/6222539/Oregon/Oregon-House-approves-jointliability-bill-aimed-at-unpaid-construction-wages","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6222539-faa24e156c25c8db71c97d6c5ac25640/orig.mp4?Expires=1771078200&Signature=Z8CqUsaM6z3thENAGzqx4TqhV8IHEAdXsSkJP922dfQnLeI2goakWBoPlGcyUV5JSXs2KfHPRChcRNZtYkLhXuEj0WZELdFqvKZqu0hYWRNl9SrJvls~3y~b4PQMknxsiEbWRVd3Dx3h1Fv05PsrA5tlDDjUs4vvtREdC~qwGwsttlN8-LspCwfupoVxEKsndlyPcqnHM4T37RQ9vvbZXOR-CBuBtAJlNTmf6oMGNYBNhHkUB6sRNWoWqrFDE3PUMgFqWk8i9ivYJNpfevZjGwx~1aDkMspv5ITPGLoY5fLikjiqnxGDAD-b-xoNq2Q7YDuNAixHOZ76QA0~NM7p-w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Oregon House of Representatives passed Senate Bill 4 26 B on May 28, 2025, a measure that creates joint civil liability for unpaid wages in the construction industry and adds a 21‑day right to cure and targeted exemptions for owner‑occupied residences and small properties.

Supporters said the bill gives workers a faster route to recover stolen wages and promotes industry accountability. Representative Max Fragula, the bill carrier, said, \"At the heart of the bill is the idea that the that hardworking Oregonians who help to build our community should be paid for the work they do.\" Proponents pointed to long complaint backlogs at the Bureau of Labor and Industries and to studies showing substantial uncollected wages in construction.

Under the legislation as debated on the House floor, a worker (or an authorized third party) may pursue unpaid wages up the contracting chain after providing written notice; owners or direct contractors have a 21‑day cure period to correct the unpaid wages before a civil suit can proceed. The bill also permits owners or direct contractors who are forced to cover unpaid wages to seek recovery from the responsible subcontractor. Sponsors said the measure includes limits and safeguards, including exemptions for primary dwellings and for some properties described in the bill as consisting of five or fewer units on a single tract.

The text discussed on the floor reduces the statute of limitations for many unpaid‑wage claims from six years to two years and allows owners and direct contractors access to payroll records and affidavits certifying compliance. Fragula told the chamber that the proposal \"only applies to individuals in violation of state law to pay workers\" and that in other states joint‑liability laws have sped recovery and increased compliance.

Opponents across the floor warned of consequences for owners, small businesses and housing. Representative Leona Elmer, who led the minority report, said the minority changes ‘‘remove owners from the chain of liability’’ and urged a narrower approach targeted at bad actors such as unlicensed labor brokers. Representative Derek Deal argued the bill \"assigns blame without offering a single concrete step that a law abiding general contractor or property owner can take to avoid claims against them\" and said the 21‑day cure could amount to owners paying wages and then attempting to recoup the money.

Speakers raised additional factual points during debate: a witness cited as Business Magazine was referenced for a figure of about $18,000,000,000 in lost wages in construction statewide; the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) was reported to have identified $50,000,000 in stolen wages and a backlog of more than 1,200 workers with pending claims; and proponents noted that only two construction labor contractors were then registered with the agency responsible for that licensure.

On procedural motions, the House refused a motion to substitute the minority report for the committee report and rejected motions to re‑refer the bill to committee or to rules. After extended debate and roll calls, the clerk announced that \"Senate Bill 4 2 6 b, having received the constitutional majority, is declared passed.\" The final floor sequence included suspension of the requirement to read the bill section‑by‑section and the bill's advancement to final passage.

Supporters said the bill provides another enforcement tool for workers and would encourage contractors to use compliant subcontractors; opponents said the measure could increase costs for projects, chill hiring of newer or smaller subcontractors and fail to focus enforcement on labor brokers and traffickers.

Implementation details, including any effective date or administrative steps the bill requires, were not specified in the floor debate.","The Oregon House passed Senate Bill 4 26 B on May 28, 2025, creating a joint‑liability pathway for unpaid wages in the construction industry with a 21‑day cure period, exemptions for certain owner‑occupied and small properties, and a shortened statute of limitations for wage claims.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

House passes measure to tighten corporate practice‑of‑medicine rules, limit MSO control

Oregon House approves joint‑liability bill aimed at unpaid construction wages