The Montana US Senatorial Debate held on May 28, 2025, at the Alberta Blair Theatre in Billings featured key discussions between incumbent Senator Conrad Burns and challenger Jack Mudd. The debate primarily focused on pressing issues such as Social Security, economic policies, and the implications of future legislation.

The meeting commenced with a discussion on the current legislation supported by Western governors, including Governor Roscoe. Mudd emphasized the importance of evaluating the economic and social consequences of recovery plans, advocating for a broader examination of species and timelines relevant to these initiatives. He expressed optimism about the future, stating the need to improve conditions for future generations.

A significant portion of the debate centered around Social Security, prompted by a question from Jackie Yamanaka. Mudd highlighted the challenges posed by an aging population and the impending retirement of the baby boomer generation. He addressed concerns about the sustainability of Social Security, asserting that while he does not intend to cut benefits for current recipients, future adjustments will be necessary. Mudd suggested that younger generations may need to accept changes such as later retirement ages or reduced benefits to maintain the system's viability.

In response, Burns countered Mudd's claims, asserting that he has the endorsement of organizations dedicated to protecting Social Security. He criticized Mudd for allegedly supporting means testing, arguing that such measures could undermine public support for the program. Burns maintained that individuals who have contributed to Social Security should receive benefits accordingly, and he called for a reduction in government spending on non-essential items to protect the Social Security fund.

The debate also touched on Burns' travel history, with Mudd questioning the senator's acceptance of trips funded by lobbyists. This line of questioning aimed to highlight potential conflicts of interest and raise concerns about accountability in government.

In conclusion, the debate underscored the differing perspectives of the candidates on critical issues affecting Montanans. As the election approaches, both candidates will need to address these topics further to clarify their positions and engage with voters on the future of Social Security and economic policy in Montana.