[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6222316,"mediaKeyId","3609990-5fcf1a57893239037c6af03fc34c7a3f","parentId",3609990,"title","Framingham finance subcommittee approves FY2026 operating budget with small amendments; school budget taken separately","audioSeconds",1858,"startMs",88000,"endMs",1946000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3609990-5fcf1a57893239037c6af03fc34c7a3f&start=88&end=1946","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3609990-5fcf1a57893239037c6af03fc34c7a3f/thumbnail_88000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6222316/Framingham-City/Middlesex-County/Massachusetts/Framingham-finance-subcommittee-approves-FY2026-operating-budget-with-small-amendments-school-budget-taken-separately","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6222316-abe42272f1a056865dc5af104eed487b/orig.mp4?Expires=1771196180&Signature=k~WsJvwFo9RLS3gcs8yOomqhAzvi~ZrAaM60QVnK-0iSX1JMckhDPQfg8XI~fFBNvs4Rm2wkdFPeO4nMECbmBzCyK3ZfIo-kYpjFe6f9nWTJQjhRbu~02mfRpGPMPuLaGFZSdwgvw6QvMaawTUJXURgmMjzj6VKdnSNz1zzGQYSZL3tmVhFIpBYTMqAD5kSaIU6HHI9MG65je6gDpX7kX3SaKt~5zBIOexpNsx7YxXTE5O4m-JWV-Q7yTH7b4jmdCQm6NftjRoyhfn3yfglWFKChSi6aXCbqq~F87M5mk4OTApnAH8dORv5ltNqhhm~GFEiIj08GKhr5XIEQ3c0tEw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Framingham City, MA","date","2025-05-27T00:00:00Z","article","The Framingham City Council finance subcommittee voted May 27 to recommend the mayor's FY2026 operating budget to the full council with two targeted amendments and a request to the regional technical school to consider bonding a feasibility study; the panel split the school budget out for a separate vote.

The vote followed a multiweek review and debate over discretionary items. The subcommittee approved the operating budget as presented while reducing the technology purchasing line by $135,000 and lowering the snow-and-ice appropriation by $1 to preserve statutory notification duties; members also agreed to send a letter asking Keith Tech to consider bonding its feasibility study. The committee approved the school portion in a separate motion.

Why it matters: The operating budget sets municipal spending and the tax levy framework for the coming fiscal year. The subcommittee's adjustments were framed as modest, targeted moves intended to preserve oversight and delay or re-evaluate discretionary purchases while advancing a structurally balanced budget to the full City Council.

Most important facts

Mr. Cannon, chair of the finance subcommittee, opened discussion by noting the committee's limited options: \"We cannot add to the budget. We only can subtract from the budget as presented,\" and invited members to identify specific lines for reduction. The school department and the school committee had voted to accept the mayor's number earlier in the month; the subcommittee therefore treated the school request and the mayor's recommendation as aligned.

After discussion, the subcommittee adopted two amendments to the mayor's proposed operating budget: a $135,000 reduction to a planned purchasing/software expenditure in Technology Services and a symbolic $1 reduction to the snow-and-ice appropriation designed to trigger earlier council notification if the administration needs to exceed that line. Members described the software appropriation as worthy of more review before purchase; one councilor said the administration reported the software would not yet produce measurable position savings.

The subcommittee also agreed to request that Keith Tech (the regional technical school referenced in the meeting) consider bonding its feasibility study rather than including the study expense in Framingham's operating budget; a councilor estimated that bonding the study could reduce the town's near-term budget pressure by roughly $300,000 if the technical school proceeds with that route. Councilors acknowledged the technical school would have to consider and approve that financing approach and that municipalities retain a defined window to reject any district-level borrowing.

Public comment and deliberation

Resident Richard Bloomfield, speaking in public comment, criticized the draft budget process and use of free cash, saying the presentation showed \"no strategy, no awareness, no open meeting discussion\" and urging greater transparency on longer-term liabilities and priorities. The committee also heard from Mr. Hufford, director of highways and sanitation, during discussion about snow-and-ice spending and multiyear trends.

Votes and formal actions

The subcommittee moved to recommend favorable action on all operating budget line items except the school portion, with the two amendments described above and with a request letter to Keith Tech. On that motion the roll call included: Chair (Finance Subcommittee): yes; Mr. Alexander: yes; Mr. Steiner: yes; Ms. Malek: yes; Mr. Cannon: no. The motion carried and the committee then voted separately to recommend favorable approval of the school portion; that separate motion passed on roll call without recorded opposition.

What the committee did not do

Committee members repeatedly emphasized constraints: they cannot add funds beyond the mayor's submission except in narrowly defined circumstances (for example, a two-thirds vote would be required to add to the school appropriation). Several councilors said they lacked authority to force structural changes in the school department budget and urged the school committee and school administration to lead cost-control or service-prioritization efforts.

Looking ahead

The finance subcommittee will forward its recommendations and the record of its vote to the full City Council. Several members requested follow-up briefings over the summer on the snow-and-ice multi-year spending patterns and on the administration's business-case justification for the proposed purchasing/software modules before the council finalizes its votes.

Ending

The full City Council will take up the operating and school budgets in its upcoming meetings; the finance subcommittee's recommendation and the recorded amendments now go to that chamber for final action.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Framingham City Finance Subcommittee 5-27-25","oneSentenceSummary","The Framingham City Council finance subcommittee voted May 27 to recommend the mayor's FY2026 operating budget to the full council with two targeted amendments and a request to the regional technical school to consider bonding a feasibility study; the panel split the school budget out for a separate vote.","taxTitle","Framingham City, Middlesex County, Massachusetts","taxId",12558,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6222311,"Framingham delays $11M Saxonville intersection project; adds Memorial Building roof and downtown lighting to capital list",173,2973000,3146000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3609990-5fcf1a57893239037c6af03fc34c7a3f&start=2973&end=3146","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3609990-5fcf1a57893239037c6af03fc34c7a3f/thumbnail_2973000.jpg","/articles/6222311/Framingham-City/Middlesex-County/Massachusetts/Framingham-delays-11M-Saxonville-intersection-project-adds-Memorial-Building-roof-and-downtown-lighting-to-capital-list","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6222311-25c01805cce64a522df22f25bd5c5b13/orig.mp4?Expires=1771196180&Signature=dS92uVb-WoMZUSnntQ4YP8j10xuLVGqTUWe~S0gFeKxu3pmLTzU-FfEjoDXIhIOciR55dMLZFpSk7VRDUa6CqPzDVDqgGzEAHzwF3hA1HR9FnmeKeHL0X5~-SLr~6Nw3mG-SBPaDAlP654Am4rGvCBxGOP0sQTW18tU9Bb-qWPZxn6DCI5DQkGUtxkMdKmgAHL3MBTjSbmgybsoHpkZPDIg1tBhns3FIiae1nDau7PXL8jasZFa62QxkTOjCo~dezOwLEOwX-8oHujUEB-Y8AI-85iM1J236BIbO7v0fBjIS6xYWHuBVQBmqcs317IFpF33jd11sPnSgu2zT~uTdbw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Framingham finance subcommittee on May 27 recommended shifting the timing of a major Saxonville intersection project out of FY2026 and added near-term capital items including a roof replacement for the Memorial Building and $200,000 for downtown street lighting.

The changes reflect new property-negotiation options the administration described that could reduce the construction scope and cost of reworking the Saxonville intersection. Subcommittee members also approved adding a roof-replacement line for the Memorial Building and flagged Loring Arena roof needs for future work; they directed staff to pursue non-bonded funding for downtown lighting, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) reallocation if feasible.

Why it matters: The Saxonville intersection project had a preliminary estimate near $11 million; changes to the acquisition and geometry plan could substantially lower construction cost and alter the timing of any required borrowing. The Memorial Building roof and downtown lighting are locally visible capital priorities that affect pedestrian safety, municipal facilities and downtown business areas.

Key details

Officials explained that a complicated geometry at the Danforth/Concord/Water/Central/ McGrath Square area has made a traditional signalized redesign expensive; the $11 million figure reflected earlier design assumptions and multimodal improvements. Administration staff said parties have negotiated a possible exchange that would let the city reconfigure the Danforth/Concord corner into a more conventional four-way intersection, reduce required right-of-way takings, add parking to an adjacent municipal lot and simplify signal needs. Those negotiations include a proposed property exchange with the owner of the Saxonville Mills; terms were described as still under negotiation.

On the Memorial Building, the administration sought funding for a roof replacement and noted pending accessibility work (bathrooms and other accessibility upgrades) and future masonry repairs. Committee members asked for a follow-up briefing to better understand medium- and long-term capital needs for the Memorial Building before committing larger sums.

The committee recommended adding $200,000 to the downtown improvements line for additional street lights. Staff said the plan likely could use existing poles with taller fixtures and that the funds might come from available CDBG balances rather than a new bond issue.

Votes and next steps

The capital-list changes were reviewed during the subcommittee's capital budget discussion; members agreed to table some large roadway projects for a dedicated review and directed staff to bring more detailed cost and funding options back to the committee. The subcommittee scheduled focused follow-ups: a capital review session the week before the city council's capital vote and a separate session with DPW to review unaccepted streets and large roadway requests.

What the committee did not decide

Members did not adopt a final dollar estimate that replaces the earlier $11 million Saxonville figure; they said the new acquisition-and-exchange approach should allow a smaller, later capital request but that final design and appraisal work must be completed before a firm cost is presented. The committee declined to fund the full $11 million allocation in FY2026 and instead recommended reworking the project timeline and funding approach.

Ending

Staff will return to the finance subcommittee with more detailed design, appraisal and funding options for Saxonville and with a schedule for Memorial Building follow-up work and downtown lighting funding recommendations.","During its May 27 meeting the finance subcommittee recommended removing a planned $11 million Saxonville intersection allocation from FY2026, added a Memorial Building roof project and Loring Arena roof consideration, and proposed $200,000 for downtown street lighting (to be covered from CDBG or other non-bond sources).","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Framingham finance subcommittee approves FY2026 operating budget with small amendments; school budget taken separately

Framingham delays $11M Saxonville intersection project; adds Memorial Building roof and downtown lighting to capital list