The Nashville Short Term Rental Appeals Board meeting on May 28, 2025, spotlighted a contentious appeal regarding a short-term rental (STR) permit renewal, raising significant questions about residency definitions and compliance.
Seth Klein, representing the appellant, emphasized the importance of the case, noting that the appeal arose from a renewal affidavit issue. He highlighted that the appellant, Ms. Cameron Daniel, had previously complied with all regulations and had received support from neighbors, as evidenced by four letters included in the appeal packet. Klein argued that the documentation provided, including W-2 tax forms and other residency proofs, clearly demonstrated that Ms. Daniel and her husband maintain their primary residence at the property in question.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The discussion also touched on the interpretation of residency, with Klein referencing a statement from Board Member Williams about the presumption of where a married couple resides. He asserted that the evidence presented supports the claim that Ms. Daniel's home is indeed her primary residence, countering any allegations of improper STR activity.
Klein pointed out that previous complaints regarding the property had been investigated and found unsubstantiated, reinforcing the argument that Ms. Daniel is not operating the property as a full-time rental. Instead, she and her family reside there during the week, which he argued aligns with the city's STR regulations.
As the board deliberates, the outcome of this appeal could set a precedent for how residency is defined in Nashville's STR regulations, impacting future applications and renewals. The board's decision will be closely watched by both supporters and opponents of STRs in the city.