During the Sedro-Woolley City Council meeting on May 28, 2025, residents expressed significant concerns regarding the proposed development of housing by Family Promise adjacent to their homes. The discussions highlighted the tension between community support for Family Promise's mission and the apprehensions of nearby residents about the potential negative impacts on their neighborhoods.
One resident, Elizabeth, who lives next to Family Promise, shared alarming personal experiences, including incidents of violence and disturbances that she attributed to the organization’s activities. She voiced her fears about the proposed construction of 15 homes on the Methodist Church property, arguing that such developments would diminish her property value and disrupt the neighborhood's safety and tranquility. Elizabeth emphasized that while Family Promise may present positive statistics, the realities faced by neighbors are often overlooked.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Another resident, Judy, echoed these sentiments, detailing her own experiences with noise and safety issues stemming from the Family Promise facility. She raised questions about the lack of communication from the city regarding the sale of church properties and the implications of adding more housing units in an already congested area. Judy expressed frustration over not being adequately informed about the developments that directly affect her living situation.
Lynn, another concerned resident, also sought clarity on the status of the property sales and the potential impact on local infrastructure, including parking and community safety. She emphasized the need for transparency and community engagement in the planning process, particularly as it relates to the proposed housing developments.
The discussions at the meeting underscored a growing divide between the goals of social service organizations and the concerns of local residents. As the city considers the expansion of housing options, it faces the challenge of balancing community needs with the realities of neighborhood dynamics. The council's next steps will likely involve addressing these concerns and ensuring that residents are informed and involved in future developments.