Court hears plea agreement for Mario Garza on drug possession charges

The court proceedings on May 29, 2025, presided over by Judge Stephanie Boyd in the 187th District Court, focused on several key cases, including the State v. Reyes and the State v. Garza. The meeting began with discussions surrounding the admissibility of evidence in the Reyes case, particularly a written statement that the defense argued was not voluntarily completed by the defendant, Felipe Reyes. The defense contended that the handwriting on the statement varied and suggested that Reyes was instructed by officers on what to write, undermining the statement's validity. However, the prosecution maintained that Reyes signed the document voluntarily, and the court ultimately denied the defense's motion to exclude the statement.

Following this, the court addressed the plea agreement for another defendant, Mr. Ramirez Hernandez, who was scheduled to return the next day to finalize his plea. The court also called upon Mr. Mario Garza, who was present with his attorney. The judge confirmed that the state had complied with discovery requirements and that Garza had reviewed the necessary documents with his counsel. Garza acknowledged understanding the charges against him, which included possession of a controlled substance, and confirmed his intention to enter a plea.

The court clarified the implications of the plea, including the potential penalties and the rights Garza would be waiving by proceeding. The prosecution indicated a willingness to move forward without certain enhancements to the charges, and Garza's attorney affirmed that his client was competent and had not been coerced into entering the plea.

The meeting concluded with the court scheduling a jury trial for the following day, emphasizing the importance of all parties being present and prepared. Overall, the proceedings highlighted the ongoing legal processes and the careful consideration of defendants' rights within the judicial system.