Council member Wasser opposes using general funds for sewer fees amid bond threat

In the heart of Honolulu's city hall, a palpable tension filled the air as council members gathered to discuss pressing financial matters that could impact residents across the island. The meeting, held on May 30, 2025, was marked by a critical debate over the use of general funds for sewer fees—a topic that has stirred concern among both council members and the public.

As the session unfolded, Council Member Natalie Wasser took a firm stand against the proposal to allocate general funds to the sewer fund. Her voice resonated with urgency as she expressed her surprise that the discussion was still ongoing, despite strong recommendations from the administration against such a move. "This is a major threat to the bond ratings," she warned, highlighting the potential financial repercussions that could arise from mismanaging city funds.

Wasser's opposition was not just about numbers; it was deeply rooted in fairness for all residents. She pointed out the inequity faced by those with private sewer systems, who bear the full brunt of their costs without the benefit of general fund support. "It's unfair to every resident who has a private system," she stated, emphasizing that while some may seek to shift financial burdens, many are already paying their own way.

The discussion was further enriched by the voices of two remote testifiers, who added their perspectives to the ongoing debate. Their contributions underscored the community's concern over how financial decisions made at the council level could ripple through the lives of everyday citizens.

As the meeting drew to a close, the implications of the council's decisions loomed large. The debate over sewer funding is not merely a fiscal issue; it reflects broader questions of equity and responsibility within the city. With the stakes high, residents and council members alike are left to ponder the future of Honolulu's financial health and the fairness of its policies. The council's next steps will be crucial in determining how these discussions translate into action, shaping the landscape of public services for years to come.