[{"_1":2,"_110":-5,"_111":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,86,98],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6221696,"mediaKeyId","3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7","parentId",3611191,"title","Prosecutors present helicopter video and body‑worn camera showing vehicle crash and package; jury trial in Reyes case continues","audioSeconds",2013,"startMs",7200000,"endMs",9213000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7&start=7200&end=9213","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7/thumbnail_7200000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6221696/Texas/Prosecutors-present-helicopter-video-and-bodyworn-camera-showing-vehicle-crash-and-package-jury-trial-in-Reyes-case-continues","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6221696-ad9ac296b13551e52d60162f489af37d/orig.mp4?Expires=1771095333&Signature=nBEvoqZtrY-ynOR5s4SFXXtclqomMC0SwoO8enoUrXbo4mVBzqetAZS33CPqpeRk5LhwOxHDW4H-8iPbUhW-hOznWTZlgJ~rYus-VzdT5d5i3ohInr3GxtFArLZr-XZI5~ll1llGFbJ5GwkZQ51QePYpnJMxGr0CU5pdCN0TpPE33Gnw5w7ijhxJHbqliG483sPOY4mQpCceOtooEYHjewAmaxBSUCpCKp7OidkB5Zfhqqi4lATXfsT94ZKXM~R5iyJW5voySh80zn8NWPvl1e~FNLD5wxzF0Z2o3ZDiRRQ71rgT4ci8ZPVUkiaaJXyNFn7sm4nLFXCG1Lw5Oe8t4A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-05-30T16:58:22.443Z","article","At the jury trial of Felipe Reyes, the State published helicopter surveillance footage and a police body‑worn recording showing a vehicle that was followed by law enforcement, crashed, and from which officers recovered a backpack containing suspected narcotics and scales.

Officers from San Antonio units testified about their actions. A tactical air‑unit officer described providing infrared and daylight camera coverage, confirming the recorded footage as an accurate recording of what the unit observed. A covert-unit detective described the surveillance, the vehicle’s departure from the target location, and the subsequent crash; the detective identified the helicopter recording (State’s Exhibit 3) and the investigating officer’s body‑worn camera (State’s Exhibit 4), both admitted into evidence and published for the jury.

Nut graf: Prosecutors introduced video evidence and on‑scene testimony to show the sequence from surveillance through crash and evidence recovery. Detective testimony placed a large backpack at a secondary location near the crash; when evidence technicians opened and inspected the pack they found vacuum-sealed packages and items the officers described as consistent with methamphetamine, fentanyl pills and marijuana, plus digital scales. Detectives described standard field procedures for identifying controlled substances and said the officer retrieving the evidence later transported it to property for official processing.

Witnesses acknowledged limits in their direct observation: one air‑unit witness said he could not identify who ejected an item from the vehicle from the video; another officer said he observed a heat source move from the wreck toward an alley and later saw a person lie down and be taken into custody. The detective who handled the recovered backpack described seeing a large quantity of suspected narcotics and scales but said he did not weigh the materials at the scene; weight measurements and laboratory confirmation were not recorded in the on-the-record testimony excerpt.

Ending: The State finished direct examination after admission and publication of the surveillance and body‑worn recordings; cross‑examination explored what witnesses personally observed and what they did not. The trial remained in progress with additional witnesses and evidence to be called after a court recess.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","FRI., MAY 30, 2025/JUDGE STEPHANIE BOYD/187TH DISTRICT COURT/MOR DOC & JURY: STATE VS REYES","oneSentenceSummary","At trial in Bexar County, prosecutors published air and body‑worn camera recordings that show a vehicle fleeing, crashing and a backpack later recovered containing suspected narcotics and scales; testimony described observations but did not identify who tossed the item.","taxTitle","Judge Stephanie Boyd 187th District, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas","taxId",66298,"location","Texas","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6221701,"Court revokes Christian Spiller’s supervision; judge sends him to prison for two years",0,5100000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7&start=5100&end=5100","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7/thumbnail_5100000.jpg","/articles/6221701/Texas/Court-revokes-Christian-Spillers-supervision-judge-sends-him-to-prison-for-two-years","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6221701-60a3c1cce483d65ede5cbbd765e6f174/orig.mp4?Expires=1771095333&Signature=GJKNu3jl77fAdbIkhPhQpCw22GU~vpQfEiFP6aPEO7L8DWUodovjZpaijWOGHrZ~bNT~HR3dMLvVO9VIXD8ttUy0LlTKb9vSmjiBJ9nlIW3-ECNsUFR1uDqomDTZ6NuH2aqYUtA2zjrurjnf96Kd5wsBRCWvKzObZYAwlNt4OKujnC49V3JCpR4ScmpLNVSanfbMIuaR3h7MTtCdeF3veN-H3D8HvS5aOJQDSg26qUX0ThTURGPR~meXt-Dg~ZfmGnyPHGl-CQ7Mx6wb5Eo1rzkcDDQG6KwYGJdaQNt1Q1M1b3Q6FkPqy-zp4lnIT7ZXm63ksBlTgASHpVt~y2czbA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The court revoked Christian Spiller’s community supervision and imposed a two-year prison sentence after Spiller pleaded true to failing to report to his supervision officer as directed.

Spiller, who had been on community supervision since a 2017 case, admitted a supplemental violation involving repeated failures to report over a sustained period. The state and defense presented a plea agreement that called for revocation of probation and imposition of a two-year term in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice; the defendant waived his right to appeal under that agreement.

Nut graf: The judge followed the plea agreement, revoked Spiller’s probation and sentenced him to two years in prison with credit for time served and a restriction that he not reside with minors. The court also requested therapeutic community placement to address substance issues.

The record shows Spiller had been on supervision with a three-year term (from a 2019 incident) and that the revocation was tied to reporting failures across months. Spiller told the court he had previously struggled with placement and employment; the judge accepted the negotiated resolution and explained the weapon-possession consequences that accompany felony convictions.

Ending: The court entered the revocation and sentence on the record and asked that Spiller be considered for a therapeutic program; administrative processing will follow.","After admitting a violation, Christian Spiller’s community supervision was revoked and the court sentenced him to two years, following a plea-agreement recommendation to convert the suspended sentence.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6221706,"Juan Ortiz sentenced to 14 years in prison after no-contest pleas in two drug cases",420,3720000,4140000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7&start=3720&end=4140","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7/thumbnail_3720000.jpg","/articles/6221706/Texas/Juan-Ortiz-sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison-after-no-contest-pleas-in-two-drug-cases","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6221706-b011e800bc29d7f7938ef0a72946c0a5/orig.mp4?Expires=1771095333&Signature=IbLSb56g0uZqdGD~DgWDRek7DaIXTgIuSZvFditfpgf3OkCWThDlKeKfvJuCjJXZcAnNYq8t8yNnD0sM3EqpZyUN-Vz3Eua-~64bFAzB3g-V618Epugs5SJFjd2P4aEGPIeNBauMFiN9Z0mb3WgVnQUpDS5Ku7o4oDxkdHs4IfgZqVOaSnfWv3gC3Yrfd47syO7xuRpnqRgo3y5x2gC4n~-A5VL6okFL7pyzTSnJus1MlGklIqZPZEUJZmMi33LKItcQSsZsqaP3plN7-LBKUOkwf-NdDKclTvxQxhfXD-J2LkjYLfHUsJGAf4I7-SqaIYTJ0mLmldzn1CBWVk9aVQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Juan Ortiz entered no-contest pleas in two felony indictments and was sentenced to 14 years in prison on each count, to run concurrently, and fined $5,000.

The court accepted the state’s plea agreement in cause numbers ending in 68 and 67, which charged Ortiz with possession with intent to deliver and possession of a controlled substance in large quantities. The range of punishment for the counts presented included first-degree felony ranges; the plea paperwork and admonishments were reviewed in court and Ortiz waived his right to jury trial and the reading of the indictments.

Nut graf: Under the plea, the state recommended concurrent 14-year sentences and $5,000 fines, to be imposed together with consideration of related cases on the docket. The court reviewed stipulations and state exhibits, accepted the stipulation of testimony, and after reviewing the evidence imposed the agreed sentence and fines. The court also ordered a prohibition on residing with minors and advised Ortiz about limited appeal rights and weapon-possession prohibitions that accompany felony convictions.

During the plea hearing counsel confirmed that defenses and competency issues had been discussed; Ortiz confirmed the pleas were voluntary. The court noted the plea included consideration of two prior cause numbers and other cases on file. The judge explained that because the plea bargains were followed, the defendant waived his right to appeal, and that the weapons prohibition applied because these were felony convictions.

Ending: The court entered sentencing on the record, ordered the sentences to run concurrently, and advised Ortiz of post-sentencing limitations. The case record reflects the court’s acceptance of the plea agreements and the concurrent 14-year terms with fines.","Juan Ortiz pleaded no contest to two drug charges and the court accepted plea agreements imposing concurrent 14-year sentences and $5,000 fines, with conditions barring residence with minors.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6221711,"Judge revokes Andre Moody’s probation, sentences him to three years after GPS violation finding",900,2220000,3120000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7&start=2220&end=3120","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3611191-eb1b3e776bfc9a6ba59ec03909e3ded7/thumbnail_2220000.jpg","/articles/6221711/Texas/Judge-revokes-Andre-Moodys-probation-sentences-him-to-three-years-after-GPS-violation-finding","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6221711-d39607fcbd4f8950a766a090ccbd24d9/orig.mp4?Expires=1771095333&Signature=ktnQJJIjlOCrWjvfERYQZlvk4l601piCjknbG-4hJbatVHDVGDNbWz0LrmWS6SjXbpST-TB3fyZDRrjoJcxzn6pQB5Fk~PhQVzW-IgT4kC9rkjKIpeSs7k-EvWG52UcL6BhgLHej9B1CEyTnEwXd6U-ozhik0tpKbHx35llzFjh4~Yove~UjBehH3VZR86w9bIgTvjf8CDlBXGXIqjL~YiL54b9fRx5K4C5AUm8rrU8Xyp2Fr4gWD1TWCsVIUUlAmvOM0~Nz5EEsN7KjOV5Nt2kP2O4h611dzvwvLfC9lje1Qso42CgQMBQevxkgX4n5aKF42Q~i6r6WyfR~dwYBbA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Judge Stephanie Boyd of the 187th District Court revoked Andre Alonzo Moody’s deferred adjudication and sentenced him to three years in prison after finding he violated a GPS-condition on probation.

The court heard the State’s supplemental motion alleging a breach of condition number 29 related to Moody’s GPS monitoring. Moody pleaded “true” to that allegation during a hearing in which the judge reviewed Moody’s probation history and the state requested prison time.

The nut graf: Moody has been on community supervision for about five years with multiple prior motions to revoke. The state told the court Moody had repeated violations, multiple positive marijuana tests, incomplete parenting classes and community service, and unpaid fines. Moody testified about losing close family members, unstable housing and trouble securing steady employment. Defense counsel asked the court to impose the minimum, characterizing the violations as technical; the state asked for three years in prison.

Judge Boyd described repeated noncompliance across years and rejected continuing extensions, saying probation had not produced the required results. The judge granted the State’s motion, revoked Moody’s community supervision, found the violation true, entered an affirmative family-violence finding and sentenced Moody to three years in the Texas prison system with credit for time served. The court also asked that Moody be considered for a therapeutic community program.

During the hearing Moody said he had struggled with housing and the deaths of family members and described efforts to get identification and pursue employment and training. The court repeatedly pressed Moody about why he had not completed required programs and ordered that the probation revocation proceed. Defense asked for minimum incarceration; the state deferred to the court on final time but had sought a three-year term.

The hearing included warnings from the judge that revocation could result in imprisonment up to the statutory maximum tied to the underlying adjudication. The court explained credit for time served and that the facility, not the court, controls any day-for-day credit calculations. The judge advised Moody about post-conviction limits, including weapon possession restrictions tied to the family-violence finding.

Ending: The court’s oral pronouncement concluded the matter. Moody’s sentence was entered on the record and the judge requested therapeutic-court consideration; the record shows Moody will be processed for custody and given credit for any time served.","In 187th District Court, Judge Stephanie Boyd found Andre Alonzo Moody violated a GPS condition and revoked his deferred adjudication, imposing a three-year prison term and an affirmative finding of family violence.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Prosecutors present helicopter video and body‑worn camera showing vehicle crash and package; jury trial in Reyes case continues

Court revokes Christian Spiller’s supervision; judge sends him to prison for two years

Juan Ortiz sentenced to 14 years in prison after no-contest pleas in two drug cases

Judge revokes Andre Moody’s probation, sentences him to three years after GPS violation finding