Cache County hears appeals on Cronquist Conditional Use Permit regarding traffic concerns

The Land Use Hearing Officer Meeting held on May 30, 2025, in Cache County, Utah, commenced at 11:00 AM, led by appointed officer Rob Patterson. The meeting focused on two appeals concerning a conditional use permit issued to Cronquist and Crazy Longhorn Ranch. This was the second hearing on these matters, indicating ongoing community concern.

Patterson outlined the procedural framework for the hearing, emphasizing his quasi-judicial role and the importance of evaluating the planning commission's decision based on legal standards and substantial evidence. He invited the appellants to present their arguments, followed by responses from the county and additional comments from interested parties.

The first appellant, Donna Hummel, raised significant concerns regarding the traffic assessments conducted for the permit. She argued that the January 2025 traffic study did not adequately reflect the increased traffic flow during the spring and summer months. Hummel highlighted the lack of consideration for foot and bicycle traffic, as well as the obstructed views caused by foliage on the road, which she claimed posed safety risks, particularly with the anticipated passage of wide construction vehicles.

Hummel also questioned the legitimacy of access rights for Crazy Longhorn Ranch, stating that the necessary right of way to reach the landlocked parcel had not been granted, as it required crossing county property. She concluded her presentation by formally submitting her appeal for consideration.

Following Hummel's presentation, Patterson engaged her with clarifying questions regarding the traffic studies and the right of way issue, indicating a thorough examination of the concerns raised.

The meeting proceeded with Sam Goble representing the second appellant, Dansie, who was set to present next. The structured format of the hearing allowed for a detailed exploration of the issues at hand, ensuring that all parties had the opportunity to voice their concerns and provide evidence.

As the meeting continued, it became clear that the outcomes of these appeals could significantly impact local land use and community safety, highlighting the ongoing dialogue between residents and county officials regarding development and its implications. Further discussions and decisions are anticipated as the hearing progresses.