City staff denies new certificate for unsanctioned property alterations

The Salt Lake City Planning Division held an Appeals Hearing on May 22, 2025, to address a case involving alterations made to a contributing structure. The primary focus of the meeting was the administrative decision regarding the property’s modifications, which included painted brick, replacement stone or concrete caps, and new windows.

The Planning Division staff reported that the alterations did not comply with seven of the eleven standards for modifying a contributing structure, as outlined in the relevant guidelines. Specifically, the painted brick failed to meet six applicable standards, while the replacement stone or concrete caps did not satisfy six standards and four guidelines. The staff noted that the work had already been completed without the necessary building permits, leading to a notice of noncompliance being recorded against the property.

In 2019, the property owner had received a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for the replacement of several windows. However, the appellant did not secure a permit for the installation of these windows, resulting in enforcement actions. Following the expiration of the initial COA, the appellant reapplied for a new one, which prompted staff to discover additional unapproved modifications, including the painted brick and further window replacements.

During the hearing, it was highlighted that discussions between the staff and the appellant aimed at reaching an agreement had ultimately failed, leading to an administrative denial issued on April 21, 2025. The staff emphasized that the replacement windows did not match the original design and profile, further complicating the case.

The meeting concluded with a clear indication that the alterations made to the property did not adhere to the established standards and guidelines, underscoring the importance of compliance in preserving the character of contributing structures within the city. Further actions and next steps regarding the case were not detailed in the meeting, leaving the resolution of the matter pending.