[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6545516,"mediaKeyId","3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5","parentId",3619563,"title","Swimmers urge Shorewood schools to stop closing indoor pools for lightning; speakers and board cite lack of documented indoor lightning deaths","audioSeconds",132,"startMs",225000,"endMs",357000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5&start=225&end=357","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5/thumbnail_225000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6545516/Wisconsin/Swimmers-urge-Shorewood-schools-to-stop-closing-indoor-pools-for-lightning-speakers-and-board-cite-lack-of-documented-indoor-lightning-deaths","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6545516-541f5dc3370452c4486ef7a3ba4e802e/orig.mp4?Expires=1773560023&Signature=k4nS8FLZDUPHFBm5el1JGLGURC-vmZYaGb-42wyNq~GrpeTPuzKo1v5w-xXPFGQiOTyzEuDY1PnaQoyzWweewlnp0PoDa2dBUoDX8s93Q3Pw40O~5Eg45CfJ2PBlo~qz9I8eiCt538rdV7yDlFjpld5YX0JczV9imSRyZUZk~bc~RMfOgmGTd-WIa1lzNFf9QlaZSeAaF~P9GYuZ89Z-D-ckAvIUkFd9asnOVqcHhtmE0qRzXhd1v8sruyN-NHg6wfMCS6vi~j9LA-VamPcfRJNSZ8jZgJ~EgE7J7QsRtm8-v76HXCJYxjSagjDrC8bKjInXMeIrytlwf1g9f4bmwA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","WI / Shorewood School District","date","2025-05-27T00:00:00Z","article","Multiple community members asked the Shorewood School District and village officials to rethink policies that require closing indoor pools during lightning storms and appealed for restored summer pool hours.

At the board meeting, public commenters described being told to leave indoor pools during electrical storms and expressed frustration about shortened summer hours. One resident, Clifford Tisser of North Newhall Street, and several regular swimmers said their experience and research led them to conclude that indoor pool lightning fatalities are effectively non‑existent. “There has never ever been in this country a death caused by a lightning strike to an indoor pool,” said 1 speaker who presented printed articles to the board. She cited a U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission count of 74 electrocutions between 1990 and 2019, attributing none to lightning.

Commenters also said that closing indoor pools during storms forces patrons into less safe spaces — locker rooms, cars or outdoors — and disrupts daily routines for regular swimmers. One longtime swimmer said, “We schedule our days around our swim. ... For me personally, I'm not going to be able to swim here this summer” because shortened hours and closures make attendance impractical.

During board member reports later in the meeting, a member of the village’s recreation department advisory committee said recreation staff are following “best practices” and credited Assistant/Director Ashley (last name not recorded) with training and due diligence on pool safety decisions. The board discussed communication options for the recreation department and asked the district to partner on outreach as the department switches to a new registration system in September.

Superintendent Burgos acknowledged the concerns and asked staff to note them; the record shows board members said they would explore options for clearer communications about pool scheduling and safety policies. The meeting did not include a vote changing pool safety rules or operating hours.

The discussion underscores a recurring tension between public perception of safety policies and recreation staff protocols; speakers asked the district and recreation department to reconsider the cost to frequent users when closures are enacted.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Shorewood School District Regular Board Meeting May 27, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Several regular swimmers urged the Shorewood School District to stop closing indoor pools during lightning storms and to restore summer pool hours; commenters cited research saying indoor lightning deaths are undocumented and argued closures displace people from safer indoor spaces.","taxTitle","Shorewood School District, School Districts, Wisconsin","taxId",58417,"location","Wisconsin","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6545519,"Board renews Aramark food‑service contract; district highlights hydroponic garden and menu changes",186,2949000,3135000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5&start=2949&end=3135","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5/thumbnail_2949000.jpg","/articles/6545519/Wisconsin/Board-renews-Aramark-foodservice-contract-district-highlights-hydroponic-garden-and-menu-changes","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6545519-bbd159022d1a06d6b77b1c1ada148744/orig.mp4?Expires=1773560024&Signature=LGnmudBWpw6MExU9-kOK-8e9EFxow5520eqzJWF1Z2AaC3lcVQ34u9W-8cdYl5J0ZlurB0K24sndsnbire0ExnAkAqFJokKRfY6ZK8SFL0zbG0OPEB-xwx84B5LWvROvJwwBUvxiLvL8NVGpugjzMTA18vPpDKNX~sc4XWXWwJtq4h2HxW0e1s1kmbXqxBnOiZ~mwcyo45qBCbY0l3mA-vHHMKNDNYPLsRwBpqAUgi-bBCcLFB~Ai~01a5kUmWiEfZ80HdWSyQp2lKmPj0UL63PRT5olcaPRRkEHvkhRCXt7zAO-Tfyr8hxPZ5oUDA19wKWgfhe8f6weXMq2Mb5m9g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Shorewood School District board voted to renew its food service management agreement with Aramark for an additional year, a routine annual renewal required by state regulations following a 2023 RFP that selected Aramark as the district’s food‑service provider.

Board members moved and seconded the contract renewal; the motion passed at the meeting. The contract includes a roughly 3% price increase in line with CPI — an amount the administration characterized as a small increase of roughly $2,000 for the coming year.

Aramark Food Service Director Israel Taylor presented program performance data and plans. Taylor said breakfast participation rose by an average of 17 meals per school day and lunch by about 66 meals per school day compared with the previous year; a la carte sales declined, concentrated at the high school, which officials attributed to menu changes and exclusions of soda at elementary schools.

Taylor highlighted the district’s FlexFarm hydroponic system, which produces lettuce used in school salads and on sandwiches. “Our lettuce is homegrown in hydroponic gardens,” Taylor said, describing new signage and marketing planned to make on‑site produce more visible to students. Taylor also outlined plans to introduce “premium proteins” and other limited‑time menu specials to better compete with local restaurant options and boost high‑school participation.

Board members asked granular questions about food‑service billing items such as “extra entree” charges; Taylor explained that a reimbursable meal covers a main entree plus sides, and additional entrees are billed separately. Director Hevelin (business services) and board members thanked Taylor for the program’s community engagement work and requested continued updates on participation and food costs.

The board approved the contract renewal by motion; no member requested tabling the item for further review.

The board also approved the superintendent’s consent agenda earlier in the meeting by motion.","The board approved a one‑year renewal of the Aramark food service management contract; Aramark’s food‑service director highlighted increased participation, a school hydroponic FlexFarm and planned premium proteins and signage to boost high school meal uptake.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6545526,"Shorewood presents FY‑26 preliminary budget showing flatting deficits, proposed levy increase",673,3861000,4534000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5&start=3861&end=4534","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5/thumbnail_3861000.jpg","/articles/6545526/Wisconsin/Shorewood-presents-FY26-preliminary-budget-showing-flatting-deficits-proposed-levy-increase","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6545526-6f07e27dc767ce38d2481f59a7db68c5/orig.mp4?Expires=1773560024&Signature=cNSoNjMHXSRACMU1sR-C9ih5bwseV7tAbLzo5ABZbV-KoyOVV2ncxqP5VSP8-86a2gRA4sVcx9Kv9AIg4ZCxGaOdPRwQPCdu4bHxltg6OBQCC0Yjrzx0ZXup4Md9hRKoFNC5P~kgr~JTRlC7PZu1-wjdCHrXCr4j1GVT7RDM6Msqxg733oQibWWrxYBmKm9ZKyYdUr5~AsQjyv5SYDwpfTj1zpBquTBHrvsF5ZCYSrkq2KsPfrb5oCWSUHF0tBcpNR0U60v5Nv6AWMBvEmUH7~-EIuayZMqW~FFDgBsnM4pofGagoZ4Ru3Ow0hvmHWHIPYAumeyV2VWYaHRtKSPSgg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Shorewood School District officials presented a proposed FY‑26 preliminary budget and long‑range financial forecasts at the board meeting, outlining strategies to reduce future deficits, shore up capital funds and preserve working capital.

Director of Business Services Heather (last name not specified) and Superintendent Lori Burgos walked the board through revenue and expense assumptions, fund balance allocations and a scenario analysis showing the financial path taken after the 2023 referendum. Heather said the district is budgeting just over $31 million in general fund revenue and proposed a levy that would be approximately an 8% increase over the current year in the preliminary projection; she noted she was being conservative on state aid until final state numbers are available.

Heather said the district has focused on four strategies: flattening long‑term deficits, increasing capital fund balances to smooth large future maintenance costs (roofs, boilers, tuckpointing across 500,000 square feet of historic property), building a healthy working capital cushion for first‑half cash flow and earmarking funds for potential healthcare self‑funding. “We want to be able to put money into capital now so that we don’t have to put the same amount in later years,” she said.

The presentation included a multi‑year forecast showing earlier projections with steeper post‑referendum gaps and a newer projection with smaller deficits in later years, achieved by raising capital reserves in advance and implementing spending controls. Heather said the district projects a general fund expense of roughly $30 million (a 2.4% increase) and described the major revenue sources — property taxes, state aid and federal funds — and the sensitivity of Shorewood’s levy to state aid changes.

Board members pushed for additional transparency and suggested structural changes to board oversight. Nathan (last name not specified) and others recommended forming a finance committee or a financial sustainability task force to delve into details such as compensation, benefits and long‑term liabilities; Heather said she would bring a formal proposal for board consideration. A few board members cautioned that past attempts to convene a community finance committee had uneven attendance and recommended careful scoping and recruitment if the board proceeds.

Several board members asked for more granular reporting (salaries and benefits, consultants) and Heather said some breakdowns are straightforward while others require additional time to compile from thousands of line items. Burgos suggested the question of “where do we want to be at the end of the operating referendum” should guide long‑term planning; board members agreed that alumni outcomes, enrollment trends and program offerings should inform any future referendum strategy.

Heather proposed shifting the board’s regular meeting start time to 6 p.m. beginning in July and moving a September meeting that conflicts with Rosh Hashanah; the board agreed to a 6 p.m. start and to shift the September meeting date.

No final votes on the budget occurred at the meeting; the board is scheduled to consider a preliminary budget adoption on June 10 and a final adoption in October after state aid and property valuation information is finalized.","District finance officials outlined the FY‑26 preliminary budget and long‑range forecast, noting efforts to flatten post‑referendum deficits, increase capital reserves and maintain working capital; board members pressed for further financial oversight and possible advisory structures.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6545531,"Shorewood board hears public frustration over teacher nonrenewals, district pledges clearer notices",166,1248000,1414000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5&start=1248&end=1414","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3619563-8972308258e72c9d8c7b04f9e6b103b5/thumbnail_1248000.jpg","/articles/6545531/Wisconsin/Shorewood-board-hears-public-frustration-over-teacher-nonrenewals-district-pledges-clearer-notices","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6545531-a53073bb0218555f421097d25c32b935/orig.mp4?Expires=1773560024&Signature=CxUP9531e~DvkusJagJM5gNoIoxtSBJJBVFDE0TfRp-SidsrgEo3TGHup2sPNY4-Ro1vrn2dAu6yDJrrMc~t0I9pXnKfJ2W8~hPrguVdMAOzgo1UHa585Kll0iieVWOVIX0VCBCK-k~HxA4dwbAJx4D8Ai-~3iKr17GwaupoeWrBjV0AnBzYNKk8C2vEARXKSljUR1ZQTDkV9sldHyby9lagMf85iEqm~7H5-QHRP7g-DlRMVVn8uAECSEqZWH~fFPXX15xd5zzaKoI6lhYF5wYiZgH6HKs6f-1DeIJyZbck98Sxec1vPXoCsCtrboiPAZARg7O4MJn5FEPYJyA7FQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Public concern over recent notices of teacher nonrenewals and part‑time reductions dominated public comment and the superintendent's report at the Shorewood School District board meeting.

Several speakers said the district’s timeline and the lack of employee names in published materials left families and staff confused and anxious. “It quite frankly felt very dishonest, the way it was run,” said a public commenter who identified herself as a Shorewood resident, urging more transparent, earlier communication. Ian Skrowski of East Lake Boulevard also criticized the district’s response to emailed questions after the prior meeting, saying replies felt like “a form email.”

Superintendent Lori Burgos responded during her report that the district would provide more specific information going forward. Burgos said the district consulted legal counsel and concluded it can publish the names and positions of employees affected by notices of nonrenewal. “We can definitely do that moving forward. That would help clarify exactly what the board was voting on, because I think the lack of that specificity … painted a picture of … frustration,” Burgos said, adding that the district would put that information in future materials.

Burgos also explained the statutory timelines that govern teacher contract notifications. She said preliminary and final nonrenewal notices for teachers are constrained by an April 30–May 15 window; some changes that appear between the preliminary and final notices reflect resignations, private conferences with the board, licensure changes or other developments that can alter administrative recommendations. “When you issue a preliminary notice to an employee… they may choose to resign instead,” Burgos said, describing how such events can change what the board votes on at a later meeting.

Board members pressed the administration for clarity about exactly what was voted on at recent meetings. Board member Erin (last name not specified on the record) said she wanted to “revisit exactly what it is that this board voted on,” and emphasized the board did not vote to eliminate classes. Another board member said publishing the specific names and positions would reduce confusion.

Burgos said the district would update its FAQ and distribute it more widely — directly to people who provided contact information at public meetings and via the district newsletter — and would provide clearer, more consistent internal and external communications about the process and the legal constraints.

The discussion also touched on administrative nonrenewal timelines, which Burgos said follow a different statutory schedule (January/February) for administrators on multi‑year contracts. She said staff reductions typically begin with enrollment‑driven staffing decisions and that principals and administrative teams work to recruit additional students into courses when numbers are low before reductions are finalized.

Board members and the superintendent framed the decisions as driven by enrollment data and the district’s legal obligations, while acknowledging the community’s frustration and asking staff to improve how and when information is shared.

The meeting did not produce any vote on policy changes related to notices; Burgos said the district will begin publishing names/positions affected by nonrenewal votes in future materials and will send the FAQ link directly to community members who requested follow‑up.","Public commenters and board members pressed Shorewood School District leaders for clearer communication after recent notices of nonrenewal and part‑time reductions; superintendent said names can be published going forward and explained statutory timelines that constrained notice windows.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Swimmers urge Shorewood schools to stop closing indoor pools for lightning; speakers and board cite lack of documented indoor lightning deaths

Board renews Aramark food‑service contract; district highlights hydroponic garden and menu changes

Shorewood presents FY‑26 preliminary budget showing flatting deficits, proposed levy increase

Shorewood board hears public frustration over teacher nonrenewals, district pledges clearer notices