This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

A Tennessee court has granted a six-month extension of an order of protection in a case involving Miss Elmore and Mr. Keeney. The judge clarified that while Mr. Keeney is prohibited from contacting Miss Elmore, he is still allowed to maintain contact with his children under court-approved visitation terms.

During the hearing, the judge emphasized the importance of ensuring Miss Elmore's safety, stating, "You're not to come around or threaten or harass or have any contact with Miss Elmore other than that which is allowed by the court regarding the visitation with your children."
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

In a separate case, the court also addressed an order of protection requested by Miss Morgan against Mr. Hood. Despite Mr. Hood's claim that he had not been in contact with Miss Morgan for over five years, the judge proceeded to extend the order for up to one year after confirming Miss Morgan's desire for protection.

These decisions highlight the court's commitment to addressing domestic safety concerns while balancing parental rights. The extensions serve as a reminder of the legal system's role in protecting individuals from harassment and ensuring the well-being of children involved in such cases.

Converted from 6-2-25 Humphreys Circuit Civil 9AM Chancery 10:30 AM meeting on June 02, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI