Nevada District Attorneys oppose AB 91's early parole for serious offenders

The Senate Committee on Judiciary convened on June 1, 2025, to discuss Assembly Bill 91 (AB 91), which proposes significant changes to parole eligibility for serious offenders in Nevada. The bill has sparked considerable debate among lawmakers and legal experts, particularly regarding its implications for victims and the judicial system.

Key concerns were raised about the power granted to the parole board under AB 91. Critics argue that the bill allows an unelected body to override the decisions made by elected judges and juries. John Jones, representing the Clark County District Attorney's Office, emphasized that the parole board's ability to review sentences could undermine the principle of truth in sentencing. He expressed particular concern for victims who were assured that offenders would serve life sentences, only to receive notifications about parole hearings after a decade.

Jennifer Noble, speaking on behalf of the Nevada District Attorney's Association, echoed these sentiments, highlighting that the bill creates unprecedented parole eligibility for serious crimes. She pointed out that under AB 91, offenders convicted of heinous acts, such as child sexual assault and murder, could be eligible for parole after serving just ten years. Noble provided real-life examples of offenders whose sentences would be drastically reduced under the proposed legislation, raising alarms about the potential for repeat offenses.

The committee also discussed the vagueness of the criteria for parole eligibility, which could lead to inconsistencies in how cases are evaluated. Critics noted that the bill does not require the parole board to consider the specifics of the crime or the impact on victims, which could further alienate those affected by violent crimes.

Supporters of AB 91 argue that it is necessary to address overcrowding in prisons and to provide a pathway for rehabilitation. However, opponents maintain that the risks associated with releasing serious offenders too early outweigh the potential benefits.

As the committee continues to deliberate on AB 91, the discussions highlight a broader tension between the need for criminal justice reform and the imperative to protect victims' rights and ensure public safety. The outcome of this bill could have lasting implications for Nevada's judicial system and its approach to sentencing and parole.