As the clock struck 7 PM on a chilly February evening, the Town of Stratford's Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) convened for its monthly meeting, led by Chairman Brian O'Connor. The atmosphere was one of focused determination as council members gathered to address pressing issues concerning the town's water management and infrastructure.

The meeting commenced with the approval of minutes from the previous gathering, a routine yet essential step in maintaining transparency and accountability. With a unanimous "aye," the council moved swiftly to the next agenda item: a report from the town engineer, which was notably absent due to his unavailability. However, a report submitted by John Casey provided crucial insights into the WPCA stormwater project.

In a significant move, the council authorized the administration to negotiate a contract with Ty and Bond for the stormwater project. This decision sparked a discussion about the surprising lack of competition in the bidding process, with only one firm responding to the request for proposals (RFP). Council members expressed curiosity about this trend, noting that previous projects had attracted multiple bidders. The explanation offered pointed to a broader context: many engineering firms are currently engaged in larger infrastructure projects funded by a substantial $5.8 billion investment in the water sector, leaving them with limited capacity to take on smaller tasks.

As the meeting progressed, Superintendent Mr. Hyde reported on the water pollution control plant's performance, highlighting a minor overage in nitrogen levels but assuring that the situation would stabilize by year-end. This report underscored the ongoing challenges the town faces in managing its water quality while adhering to regulatory standards.

The discussion also touched on the coastal resilience project, specifically regarding the perimeter flood wall protection. A council member raised questions about additional fees requested by a consultant, seeking clarity on the scope of work and whether the extra funds were justified. This inquiry reflected the council's commitment to fiscal responsibility and thorough oversight of project expenditures.

With no further reports from the town attorney and no additional items on the agenda, the meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn, marking the end of a session that balanced routine approvals with critical discussions about the town's water management strategies. As the members departed, the implications of their decisions lingered, shaping the future of Stratford's environmental stewardship and infrastructure resilience.