Saratoga Springs approves area variance for Crawford's property subdivision

June 02, 2025 | Saratoga Springs City, Saratoga County, New York

Thanks to Scribe from Workplace AI , all articles about New York are free for you to enjoy throughout 2025!


Saratoga Springs approves area variance for Crawford's property subdivision

This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

The Saratoga Springs Zoning Board of Appeals convened on June 2, 2025, to discuss a proposed area variance for a two-lot subdivision at 16 Excelsior Springs Avenue. The meeting proceeded without the applicants present, but the board received a favorable advisory opinion from the planning board, allowing them to move forward with the discussion.

During the meeting, the board addressed the appeal of Jessica Crawford regarding the subdivision of her property. The application sought relief from the rear yard dimensional requirement, which mandates a 30-foot setback. The proposal requested a reduction to 12.6 feet, seeking a variance of 17.4 feet, or 58%.
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

The board evaluated the application based on several criteria, including the balance between the benefits to the applicant and any potential detriment to the community's health, safety, and welfare. They concluded that the applicant demonstrated that the subdivision could not be achieved through other feasible means, as there was no adjoining land available for purchase.

The board also found that granting the variance would not create an undesirable change in the neighborhood's character, noting that the proposal aligns with similar properties in the area. While the requested variances were deemed substantial, the board determined that the neighborhood's character mitigated this concern. They concluded that the variances would not have significant adverse physical or environmental effects and that the property would comply with standard district permeability requirements.

Family Scribe
Custom Ad
The board acknowledged that the difficulty faced by the applicant was self-created due to the desire to subdivide the property, but this was not considered a fatal flaw in the application. The motion to approve the area variance was made and seconded, with the board noting the favorable advisory opinion from the planning board as part of their decision-making process.

Converted from Saratoga - ZBA - Jun 02, 2025 meeting on June 02, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI