Kern County planners highlight wage gaps at public forum

In the heart of Kern County, a gathering of the Board of Supervisors on June 3, 2025, brought to light pressing concerns regarding employee compensation and contract negotiations. As the meeting unfolded, the atmosphere buzzed with the voices of dedicated public servants advocating for fair treatment and recognition of their contributions.

One key speaker, a representative from the Kern County Planning and Natural Resources department, highlighted a troubling trend: many skilled land use planners are leaving for better-paying positions elsewhere, particularly in Bakersfield. This exodus, driven by financial considerations, raises alarms about the county's ability to retain talent. The speaker presented a detailed comparison of salaries, revealing that all 29 county planners earn less than their counterparts in the city, with discrepancies reaching as high as $688 biweekly. This stark contrast underscores the urgent need for the county to reassess its compensation structures to prevent further loss of skilled employees.

The discussion shifted as Karen Bessard, a long-time county employee, voiced her concerns regarding a proposed tentative agreement with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). She pointed out specific sections of the agreement that she believed violated county policy, particularly regarding vacation and compensation for on-call employees. Bessard argued that the removal of certain compensation options could disincentivize workers from being available for emergency services, a critical concern for the community's most vulnerable populations.

Deborah McClanahan, a former county employee, echoed these sentiments, urging current and potential union members to carefully review the contract before signing. She emphasized the importance of respectful negotiations and the need for transparency, especially in light of the challenges faced during the pandemic.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the discussions held significant implications for the future of Kern County's workforce. The voices of employees resonated with a call for equity and recognition, leaving the Board of Supervisors with the weighty responsibility of addressing these concerns in the months ahead. The outcome of these negotiations could shape not only the livelihoods of county employees but also the quality of services provided to the community.