The California Assembly Appropriations Committee convened on June 3, 2025, to discuss Assembly Bill 247, which aims to ensure fair compensation for incarcerated individuals who actively fight wildfires. The bill proposes that no one engaged in wildfire fighting should earn less than the federal minimum wage, addressing concerns about the current low pay for these essential workers.
During the meeting, committee members highlighted the importance of recognizing the contributions of incarcerated hand crews, particularly in light of recent wildfires. Amendments to the bill were discussed, including the addition of specific language to include the Pine Grove Conservation Camp, ensuring that these workers are not overlooked in the legislation. Several assembly members were added as co-authors to strengthen support for the bill.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Concerns were raised regarding the financial implications of the bill, particularly about how the annual costs would be adjusted and the potential impact on local municipalities facing budget constraints. However, proponents argued that the state would absorb the costs through Cal Fire, and that the bill would still save the state money compared to current practices.
The discussion also touched on the broader implications of compensating incarcerated individuals fairly for their labor. Some members expressed fears that raising wages could limit opportunities for these workers, while others emphasized the need to move away from what they described as "slave labor" practices. The bill aims to provide dignity and fair pay to those risking their lives to protect communities.
As the committee concluded, several members expressed their support for the bill and requested to be added as co-authors, reflecting a growing consensus on the need for reform in how incarcerated individuals are compensated for their work in wildfire fighting. The bill will continue to be refined as it moves through the legislative process, with further discussions anticipated in the second house.