Coventry Town Council faces public backlash over fire department funding concerns

In a heated Town Council meeting held on June 2, 2025, residents of Coventry, Rhode Island, voiced their frustrations over proposed changes to local fire services and the perceived lack of representation in decision-making processes. The atmosphere was charged as citizens expressed concerns about a potential merger that they believe could lead to increased taxes and further debt for Western Coventry.

One resident passionately criticized President Lima and Councilman Pasqua, accusing them of attempting to silence community voices regarding the allocation of tax dollars. “You cannot do that. That is wrong,” the resident declared, emphasizing the belief that the proposed merger would unfairly burden Western Coventry citizens with debt incurred by the eastern part of town.

Bob Gustini, an 86-year-old resident, echoed these sentiments, recalling historical neglect of Western Coventry in favor of the eastern districts. He urged the council to allow residents to have a say in the decision-making process, stating, “We need to have some say.” His remarks highlighted a long-standing sentiment among residents that their voices have been marginalized in town governance.

The council members responded by reiterating their commitment to following the town charter and ensuring that all residents are represented in discussions about fire services. Councilman Pasqua, who recused himself from the vote on a resolution opposing state bills related to fire services, emphasized the importance of community involvement in the ongoing discussions. “Please come to the meetings and ask any question you want,” he urged, inviting residents to engage more actively in the process.

Despite the council's assurances, residents remained skeptical. Concerns were raised about the transparency of the Municipal Fire Commission and the adequacy of representation for Western Coventry firefighters. One resident pointed out discrepancies in communication regarding the commission's structure, suggesting that the council's approach may not fully address the needs of all districts.

As the meeting concluded, the council passed a resolution to continue exploring options for fire services, but the underlying tensions between the council and residents were palpable. The discussions underscored a critical moment for Coventry, as the community grapples with issues of representation, fiscal responsibility, and the future of essential services. The council's invitation for public participation may be a step toward bridging the divide, but whether it will quell the rising discontent remains to be seen.