During the Lincoln City Council meeting on June 2, 2025, a significant discussion centered around a claim made by Dr. William Coby regarding a vehicle accident involving a city bus. The meeting highlighted the complexities of the incident and the differing accounts presented by Dr. Coby and city staff.
Dr. Coby, represented by attorney Perry Persh, detailed the circumstances of the accident, which occurred in a Walmart parking lot. He described how he stopped at a stop sign before being struck by the bus, which he claimed was traveling too fast. Dr. Coby presented photographs and a map to support his assertion that the bus driver was at fault for the collision. He emphasized the inconvenience caused by the accident, including medical bills totaling over $7,000 and the loss of use of his vehicle, which he described as a significant hardship.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free City staff, including Assistant City Attorney Lily Ely, countered Dr. Coby's claims by referencing the police report, which painted a different picture of the accident. According to the report, both vehicles were traveling westbound, and Dr. Coby was allegedly changing lanes at the time of the collision. Ely stated that the report indicated no negligence on the part of the bus driver, which formed the basis for the city's denial of Dr. Coby's claim.
Council members expressed concerns about the clarity of the police report and the need for better documentation in such cases. They discussed the importance of having accurate diagrams and photographs to understand the dynamics of the accident fully. The conversation underscored the challenges faced by the council in adjudicating claims against the city, particularly those involving vehicle accidents.
As the meeting progressed, council members sought to clarify the road layout and the circumstances surrounding the accident. Dr. Coby reiterated his position, asserting that he was not at fault and that the bus driver had acted negligently.
The outcome of this discussion remains to be seen, but it highlights the ongoing challenges in addressing claims against city services and the importance of thorough investigations in ensuring accountability. The council's deliberations reflect a commitment to understanding the implications of such incidents for both residents and city operations.