Glendale council debates funding for Glendale OUT amid conflict of interest concerns

A heated debate erupted at the Glendale City Council meeting on June 3, 2025, as council members discussed a proposed $5,000 sponsorship for the Glendale Out Bridal in the Park event. The discussion quickly turned contentious, with accusations of conflict of interest and concerns over the event's leadership.

Council member Dan Brotman defended the funding, emphasizing that it was intended to support a community event that promotes inclusivity and family-friendly values. "This is not a gift to Glendale Out. It's about supporting the only bridal event being scheduled in this city," he stated, highlighting the event's positive impact on the community.

However, opposition arose from other council members who raised serious concerns about Glendale Out's leadership. One member pointed out that the founder of Glendale Out had recently been arrested for filming minors in a restroom, questioning the ethics of funding an organization led by someone with such allegations. "How in the world can we, the city of Glendale, funnel money to an organization led by this person?" they asked, expressing deep unease over the potential implications.

The discussion also touched on procedural integrity, with calls for caution regarding potential conflicts of interest. A council member argued that the city should seek clearance from the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) before proceeding with the funding, citing the importance of maintaining public trust.

Despite the heated exchanges, Brotman and other supporters of the event maintained that the funding was a necessary step to support a community that has faced challenges in recent years. "It's about supporting a community that has seen a lot in the last several years," one council member remarked, underscoring the symbolic importance of the sponsorship.

As the council voted, the motion passed with a narrow margin, reflecting the divided opinions on the issue. The meeting highlighted the ongoing tensions within the community regarding LGBTQ+ events and the complexities of navigating public funding in a politically charged environment.