Residents urge Albert County to reject Excel power line project over safety concerns

The Elbert County Planning Commission convened on June 3, 2025, to address community concerns regarding a proposed power line project by Excel Energy. The meeting featured several residents voicing their opposition, emphasizing the potential negative impacts on property values, safety, and the environment.

The first speaker, a local resident, expressed deep concern about the noise generated by the proposed power lines, stating that they "buzz all the time," contradicting Excel's claims that the noise levels would be comparable to that of a toaster. This resident urged the commission to deny the project, highlighting the community's discomfort with the anticipated disturbances.

Daryl Littlefield, another resident, took a more legalistic approach, referencing the U.S. Constitution and the concept of fee simple ownership of property. He warned the commission members about their personal liability should they proceed with negotiations that could infringe on property rights. Littlefield recounted his previous legal battles with the county, asserting that the proposed project would jeopardize his financial security and that of others in the community.

Molly Stuklick, a healthcare worker, added her voice to the opposition, stressing the challenges of evacuating vulnerable populations in emergencies, particularly in light of existing fire risks. She argued that the project would exacerbate these dangers and urged the commission to deny the proposal to prevent opening the door to further environmentally harmful energy projects.

Terry Nielsen Baird reflected on past planning commission meetings, recalling a similar situation from two decades ago involving a proposed toll road. He expressed concern that the scenic beauty of the area would be compromised, affecting property values and the quality of life for residents.

The meeting underscored a strong community sentiment against the proposed power line project, with residents calling for the commission to prioritize their concerns and deny the application. The commission's next steps remain to be seen as they consider the testimonies and implications of the project on the community.