Public speakers challenge Sacramento Sheriff on military equipment purchases during board meeting

In a recent Sacramento County Board of Supervisors meeting, discussions centered around the controversial use of military equipment by the Sheriff's Department, particularly drones and armored vehicles. The meeting, held on June 3, 2025, highlighted significant concerns regarding compliance with state law and the implications of such equipment on community safety.

One of the key moments came when a public speaker, Mr. Bliss, raised alarms about the Sheriff's Department's alleged non-compliance with Assembly Bill 481, which mandates that military equipment acquisitions must be approved by the governing body. He argued that the department's policy allows for purchases without board approval, a practice he deemed fiscally irresponsible, especially in light of potential cuts to community care programs.

Bliss pointed out that the Sheriff's Department had reported a troubling trend: military equipment was disproportionately deployed in Black and Brown neighborhoods, raising questions about the impact on public safety and civil rights. He cited statistics showing that Black individuals were targeted in 50 out of 109 reported deployments, despite making up a smaller percentage of the county's population. This pattern, he argued, contradicts the legislative intent behind AB 481, which aims to ensure that military equipment is used judiciously and only when necessary for public safety.

In response, Supervisor Rodriguez expressed support for the use of modern technology, including drones, to enhance public safety. He emphasized the importance of equipping law enforcement with the tools needed to protect both officers and civilians during critical incidents.

As the meeting concluded, the board faced a pivotal decision regarding future military equipment purchases. The discussions underscored a growing tension between the need for advanced public safety tools and the imperative to ensure that their use aligns with community values and legal requirements. The outcome of these deliberations could shape the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve, particularly in addressing concerns about equity and accountability.