[{"_1":2,"_98":-5,"_99":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6215203,"mediaKeyId","3662415-bd74802fd5e44673e1fd17ea32355fd4","parentId",3662415,"title","BZA approves several short-term rental requests and an owner-occupied extended rental across James Island and Charleston","audioSeconds",12368,"startMs",414000,"endMs",12782000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3662415-bd74802fd5e44673e1fd17ea32355fd4&start=414&end=12782","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3662415-bd74802fd5e44673e1fd17ea32355fd4/thumbnail_414000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6215203/Charleston-County/South-Carolina/BZA-approves-several-short-term-rental-requests-and-an-owner-occupied-extended-rental-across-James-Island-and-Charleston","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6215203-78039f5460ff060310445f632bdf3ded/orig.mp4?Expires=1770432318&Signature=ErbFxK4ruXPr29zouUUWm7u8dXfs54gaRVMzOqp5Xhmrxwi7gxRBAAcaOlocNbGmWa44JQj7zr9jAuNfLUAkRJ4IL2PthSxO0NEm-fPGmIECaDFo17IpmxephN4u5lqj-BLM~92HkJAQkrTc1ibJXTClJ-cyhRemyyXQnvC9mvoKmb7g2qzSQ5CdTOwC~QZdjeu3UkrQHOlHNSr-nvH-gnSG-sKcVp1NwvhsXem7gkZ2wQfRPEglLCce6cb8VxOXaQKvPB~UCX7XrJsknVgWJ4B~PpQlEGZ7cwriFTeM7cAHgLN014pl-l1F8HYR8oan0mhqXTjygUpgOB0t0xw8uw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-06-03T01:52:17Z","article","The Charleston County Board of Zoning Appeals on June 3 approved a string of requests to establish extended short-term rentals and limited home-rental uses at several properties across James Island and nearby Goat Island, and approved one owner-occupied limited home rental, all subject to the department\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0001site-plan review and conditions set by staff.

Key approvals at the June 3 meeting:
- 2173 Welch Avenue (James Island): The Board approved a special exception for an \"extended home rental\" (short-term rental) at a two-bedroom property that the applicant intends to use primarily for corporate housing and when available as a short-term rental limited to 144 days per calendar year. The applicant said corporate housing leases would typically be 30 days or longer; the BZA approved staff conditions, including completion of the short-term rental limited site-plan review and compliance with noise rules.

- 2301 Captain John Hutt Road (Goat Island): The board approved a special exception for a three-bedroom property on Goat Island to be used as an extended home rental; the applicant said guests would arrive by boat and that parking demands would be minimal because access is by water. Staff recommended and the board included standard conditions (site-plan review, compliance with Article 6.8, a 144-day aggregate limit and noise compliance).

- 1843 South Grimball Road (James Island, Middleton family): The Board approved an extended home rental application for a renovated family home. The owner said the property has been in the family for decades, the family renovated the structure and will use rental income to cover maintenance; neighbors provided letters of support. The board attached staff-recommended conditions including site-plan review, Article 6.8 compliance and the 144-day limit.

- 2046 Soledree Road (James Island, owner-occupied limited home rental): The board approved an owner-occupied limited home rental application; the applicant said the request would allow episodic family use and generate income for care of aging parents. The owner previously held a limited-home rental permit that lapsed; the BZA approved renewal under the county\u0000s short-term rental/limited-home rules with the usual pre-permit site-plan review and noise compliance requirements.

Board members repeatedly emphasized that approvals were conditioned on county site-plan review and permit processing; several members noted parking and access issues are handled through the site-plan and permit stage, and neighbors were encouraged to report specific violations to county code enforcement if problems arise. The board\u0000s short-term-rental approvals were unanimous except where noted in the transcript minutes.

Why it matters: Charleston County continues to process numerous short-term and extended home rental applications; the BZA approvals show the county\u0000s approach to allowing rental income while preserving neighbor protections through site-plan review, occupancy limits and noise rules.

Speakers (select): Justin Hetherington (applicant, Welch Avenue); Benjamin Farmory (Goat Island applicant); Dr. Stuart Middleton (applicant, South Grimball Road); Art Wilder (applicant/owner-occupant, Soledree Road); Mr. Ziegler and Ms. Working (county staff) ; multiple neighbors who commented in support or with questions about parking and safety.

Authorities cited: Charleston County Zoning and Land Development Regulations, Article 6.8 (short-term and limited home rental rules) ; standard BZA procedural rules.

Actions: Motions to approve each special exception were made and carried; staff conditions attached included: completion of the short-term rental limited site-plan review prior to zoning permit approval, compliance with Article 6.8, the 144-day aggregate limit per calendar year for non-owner-occupied properties, and ensuring tenant compliance with the Charleston County noise ordinance. Board follow-up: staff to send final written decisions within 10 business days and monitor compliance through permit processes.

Provenance (excerpt): \"The applicant and property owner ... are requesting a special exception to establish a short term rental property ... The property is 0.16 acres and contains a single family residence with 2 bedrooms... The property will serve 2 distinct but complimentary purposes: corporate housing and short term rental...\"","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","06/02/2025 - Charleston County Board of Zoning Appeals","oneSentenceSummary","During a long June 3 hearing the Charleston County BZA approved multiple special exceptions to allow short-term or extended home rentals at properties on James Island, James Island/Goat Island and South Grimball Road, subject to standard site-plan review and permit conditions.","taxTitle","Charleston County, South Carolina","taxId",3700,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6215208,"Board grants variance to Strobel scrapyard to waive landscape buffers after owners cite capped landfill",521,999000,1520000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3662415-bd74802fd5e44673e1fd17ea32355fd4&start=999&end=1520","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3662415-bd74802fd5e44673e1fd17ea32355fd4/thumbnail_999000.jpg","/articles/6215208/Charleston-County/South-Carolina/Board-grants-variance-to-Strobel-scrapyard-to-waive-landscape-buffers-after-owners-cite-capped-landfill","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6215208-ebea970730d42937b208a2c0bda972db/orig.mp4?Expires=1770432318&Signature=O~OwGIGd7I3v-hxcpHE9sF0mMNFN6h-os-mNY16s~u1nZs3qQvRITVLHidNmBkGhfsvYsk5ycJpU8cgdGbN8M1Z6f5FoYdL1zMGr63xGEHpgkaBCTIaZ5hxIfASzKHeifSMAGZLa~0FG35YuwLilpdqmEClK8GwK0gAh21OUvXyw~rcHThABMSPzweb64fADY9yO3TQmVmEVIrgcRK55VrvvolVjUrYhNjMBBxk0XXkk5BxDHwbCAbJC~zvplXwgMZbOYxDjb3PlF93tjZSADucTaI2M9LaewS2IVar9cFJEUk6FcUYSRlvpPx9USmCAZJBXY73G3hMsjdeJQJdLDg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Charleston County Board of Zoning Appeals granted two variances on June 3 allowing Strobel B & D Scrapyard at 1951 Stokes Avenue to continue operations without the code-required 8-foot vehicular perimeter buffer and the 40-foot Type F land-use buffer adjacent to residential properties.

Applicant Ross Appel, representing Strobel B & D, told the board the 5.42-acre site has been a salvage yard since 1984 and sits atop a former landfill that was later capped. Appel and the scrapyard owner, Sean Strobel, argued that installing the full required landscape buffers would require disturbing the landfill cap, potentially creating environmental risks; the owners also said they have undertaken cleanup and screening measures along the property line, removed unpermitted structures, improved fencing and vegetation, and negotiated a written agreement with a neighboring landfill operator to avoid encroachment into the narrow buffer area.

Neighbors and a nearby resident who spoke at the hearing expressed concern about safety and the site\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000
A long-term neighbor, Ricky Catino, said he was worried about possible contamination stemming from the landfill\u0000and asked whether DHEC had ever required formal closure procedures for the capped site. Barry Whalen, a technical professional brought by the applicant, said the site did not appear on DHEC pollution maps and described the capping as historically common in the county. Appel told the board the applicant has already removed unpermitted structures and improved border vegetation and fencing and offered a written condition to maintain the buffer area and refrain from placing containers or materials in the narrow 8-foot strip.

Board deliberations focused on the variance criteria: members found extraordinary and unique site conditions (the capped landfill, historic use since 1984), concluded strict application of the ordinance would unreasonably limit remediation and redevelopment, and determined the relief would not substantially harm adjacent properties because the owner had voluntarily cleaned and screened the boundary and agreed to a written commitment with the adjoining property owner. The board attached the staff-recommended condition that the site plan review be completed prior to zoning permit approval, and the owner's written agreement with the neighbor was incorporated into the approval. The motion to approve passed unanimously.

Why it matters: The decision allows an established industrial use to continue while acknowledging environmental and site constraints that complicate full compliance with contemporary landscape buffer standards. The board's order requires the owner to complete site plan review and formalize written protections for neighbors.

Speakers: Ross Appel, attorney for Strobel B & D (applicant); Sean Strobel, owner/operator (business); Barry Whalen, technical professional/engineer (consultant); Ricky Catino, nearby resident (opponent); board members including Trueslow and Veil (Board of Zoning Appeals).

Authorities cited: Charleston County Zoning and Land Development Regulations (variance criteria, section 3.100.6); South Carolina Code (citation referenced by staff for BZA authorities during agenda announcements).

Actions: Board motion to approve variance to waive an 8-foot vehicular-perimeter buffer and a 40-foot Type F buffer for the salvage yard (motion passed unanimously). Conditions: complete site plan review prior to zoning permit approval; execution of neighbor agreement addressing activities in the immediate buffer area.

Provenance (excerpt): \"...the property has been operating as a scrapyard since 1984... prior use as a landfill... turning soil would disturb the existing landfill and create a host of problems... we've agreed not to do anything in that 8 foot buffer zone... the bottom line of that agreement is we are agreeing not to do anything in that 8 foot buffer zone...\"","Board approved variances to waive an 8-foot perimeter buffer and a 40-foot Type F land-use buffer for an operating salvage yard on Stokes Avenue, citing a capped landfill and remediation concerns raised by the owner.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6215213,"BZA upholds county——zoning director on vape-shop permit in Hunt Club development",385,3988000,4373000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3662415-bd74802fd5e44673e1fd17ea32355fd4&start=3988&end=4373","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3662415-bd74802fd5e44673e1fd17ea32355fd4/thumbnail_3988000.jpg","/articles/6215213/Charleston-County/South-Carolina/BZA-upholds-countyzoning-director-on-vape-shop-permit-in-Hunt-Club-development","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6215213-31ba9318011cc4ea18f6d7259b6065a7/orig.mp4?Expires=1770432318&Signature=hokyHyB5v3QhYSjTAFwwQzi-ckKRjM~-q6BVZpjJCrzZfHh9qlBk6pT~4Q6f5zZkg-Ct5PDepFSEW4eKuE-ZSRPZUfzDwioSPKqYr5hoR-9iO5acfG65Oi6WlhL~fnEm6gzgBEc6~x~tR2BFy432R4pd6BWuv6NmmwoiQKzG~0FpCHt8ui3q93W9tabJxJLcGxLI1BtYukp9IGQJ30n1JnOCElU84qdvTnUWn7x-znvWG~~xbAjlnad8ECYYQcGG557~mhOxlX~Cy-HhThxn46CTiPtLQgcgvsaVvCKoDwFz4wkyLH5waqsivYLNDUjHwsSRHJ-ydp-W-lLfbcVNIw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Charleston County Board of Zoning Appeals on June 3 rejected an appeal by Hunt Club homeowners and affirmed the zoning director\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000decision to allow a vape-only permit in a village commercial unit, finding no abuse of discretion.

The appeal was filed by homeowner LaDawn Page and represented by attorney Jessica Monsell, who argued the permit violated conditions agreed when the Hunt Club PD was amended in 2021 and relied on state statutory definitions that classify e-cigarettes and vapor products as tobacco products. Monsell and neighborhood residents, including several who testified about community expectations and public health concerns, asked the board to revoke the zoning permit issued last fall and require a PD amendment for any vape-related retail use.

County staff and the property owner countered that the permit before the board was for a vape-only retail use limited in the letter of intent and did not include tobacco sales. The county\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000zoning staff pointed to the County Zoning and Land Development Regulations (ZLDR), which instructs staff to consult Merriam-Webster when uses are undefined in the ordinance, and to the PD text that removed the antiquated term \"tobacconist\" from the county use table in a 2021 zoning overhaul.

After more than an hour of testimony and a 10-minute extension for the appellant\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000and questioning, the board voted to sustain the director\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000decision, finding staff had followed the ZLDR and that the applicant had limited the permitted retail to vape products only. The motion to uphold staff passed unanimously.

Why it matters: The case highlights a recurring zoning tension in Charleston County: whether novel commercial formats (here vape shops) fit into older use categories removed or altered by recent ordinance revisions. Neighbors argued the spirit of the Hunt Club PD forbids tobacconists; staff and the permittee said the narrowly worded permit and county rules support the director's interpretation. The choice leaves the county\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000director's decision intact for now; appellants were told they may appeal the BZA order to circuit court within 30 days of its mailing.

What people said (select): \"The PD amendment removed tobacconists and the county should not have issued this permit,\" attorney Jessica Monsell for the appellant said in her presentation. \"The zoning permit is limited to vape products and excludes tobacco sales,\" said Nikki Grimble for county staff.

What\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000's next: The BZA's written order will be mailed to parties within 10 business days; the decision can be appealed to circuit court.

Speakers: Jessica Monsell, attorney (representing appellant) ; LaDawn Page, Hunt Club homeowner (appellant) ; Nikki Grimble, Charleston County Zoning and Planning staff (staff) ; Ross Appel, attorney (representing property owner) ; James or corporate representative for Hunt Club Medical LLC (tenant/property owner) ; multiple homeowners and public commenters (residents).

Authorities cited: Charleston County Zoning and Land Development Regulations (ZLDR); Hunt Club Plan Development, PD 73E; South Carolina Code (cited by participants) 16-17-501 (tobacco law) ; ZLDR Article 12.2 (dictionary rule).

Actions: Appeal by homeowner sustained? No. Board decision: uphold county director decision (motion: uphold director; outcome: upheld).","Charleston County\u0000\u0000Board of Zoning Appeals on June 3 upheld the county zoning director's decision to allow a vape-only retail permit at a Hunt Club commercial unit, rejecting an appeal by neighborhood homeowners who said the planned development (PD 73E) prohibited tobacconists.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

BZA approves several short-term rental requests and an owner-occupied extended rental across James Island and Charleston

Board grants variance to Strobel scrapyard to waive landscape buffers after owners cite capped landfill

BZA upholds county——zoning director on vape-shop permit in Hunt Club development