Excel Energy evaluates transmission line options for Elbert County including overhead and underground routes

Elbert County residents are grappling with the implications of a proposed overhead transmission line, as discussions during a recent Planning Commission meeting highlighted concerns over environmental impacts and community aesthetics. The meeting, held on June 4, 2025, continued discussions from a previous session on June 3, focusing on the feasibility and potential alternatives for the transmission line route.

The evaluation process for the proposed line involved assessing 500 miles of potential routes, though not all were deemed feasible. Factors such as environmental impact and community preferences played a significant role in determining the most suitable option. While technical feasibility was confirmed for many routes, the selection process emphasized balancing these technical aspects with the potential impacts on local wetlands and wildlife.

A key point of contention arose regarding the possibility of burying parts of the transmission line to preserve the scenic vistas that attract many residents to Elbert County. While undergrounding is often considered more aesthetically pleasing, it comes with a significantly higher cost—reportedly ten times more expensive than overhead lines. The representatives from Xcel Energy indicated that while underground options were initially contemplated, they were ultimately deemed not in the best interest of ratepayers. They noted that undergrounding is typically reserved for urban areas where overhead lines cannot be accommodated.

Residents expressed frustration over the potential visual impact of overhead lines on the rural character of Elbert County. The discussion revealed a broader concern about how the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) evaluates such projects, with residents questioning whether community preferences are adequately considered in the decision-making process.

The meeting also touched on the technical limitations of underground lines, with representatives explaining that while it is feasible to bury lines up to certain voltage levels, the practicality diminishes with distance and power requirements. This technical complexity adds another layer to the ongoing debate about the best approach for the transmission line.

As the Planning Commission continues to navigate these discussions, the outcomes will significantly impact the community's landscape and the residents' quality of life. The next steps will involve further evaluations and potential adjustments to the proposed plans, as officials seek to balance technical feasibility, environmental stewardship, and community desires.