[{"_1":2,"_120":-5,"_121":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86,98,109],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6533880,"mediaKeyId","3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd","parentId",3650258,"title","Board adopts State Fire Marshal-recommended fire-hazard severity zones; WUI requirements will apply in designated areas","audioSeconds",282,"startMs",4378000,"endMs",4660000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd&start=4378&end=4660","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd/thumbnail_4378000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6533880/San-Joaquin-County/California/Board-adopts-State-Fire-Marshal-recommended-fire-hazard-severity-zones-WUI-requirements-will-apply-in-designated-areas","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6533880-7b70614854cce23ae64fea8556a37463/orig.mp4?Expires=1771134405&Signature=Mz1jFD3P8wlOFYqI3wbefEG7YUDxskDwN-eAmIBek4oCokZJ39JqqxTtzJFF3fV1sDyhm6oIcmO-npaHVoHVp5qHmtOZ03QXOtFincNYK3em8k3de8Plyoc-vmMnCIlxDsn5gtXS85qZIXOgp7QZOy1RRSZi0gtumfHAuHq0DzVEzxpKJ5GpjeaQgbGu~IXlySJbxLzIqiG5f333~L929hUMdQCGsTGDZWl9ytokOLWFPX8BKOepao-cSuozItGAFpqhJO9G4641JHO~0N-cZX5m1TQsAHfB70PvovdQk9orPsi6QHwo7L-8jEsIGYiuSdf5xd6R5Fkzb-KyCuKJMg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-06-03T21:41:15Z","article","The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance on June 3 to designate 2025 fire-hazard severity zones consistent with the Office of the State Fire Marshal's recommendations. Assistant Director Merlo of the Community Development Department presented the map, explained the difference between local responsibility areas and state responsibility areas, and described the effect of local designation on building permits and wildland-urban-interface (WUI) code requirements.

Why it matters: designation of fire-hazard severity zones places WUI construction and defensible-space requirements on new development and remodels inside the mapped areas; that can affect building materials, permitting costs and, potentially, insurance considerations for property owners.

Scope and locations noted in the presentation

- The map identifies local responsibility areas in northeast and eastern portions of the county and in parts of the southwest near Tracy and Mountain House where the map shows moderate and high hazard designations.
- Community Development staff specifically noted Clement's Fire Protection District, Linden/Peters, Farmington, Tracy and Mountain House as local-response areas where moderate and high hazard designations appear on the map provided by the Office of the State Fire Marshal.

Board discussion highlights

- Supervisor Rickman described increased local fire frequency and suggested staff explore incentives and coordination with Valley Air and CARB (California Air Resources Board) to find grant or incentive opportunities for private landowner fuel breaks and other mitigation measures. Staff said they had not yet explored that but would consult with local fire districts and relevant partners.
- Supervisor Guardia asked whether the map had been updated recently; staff said an earlier map had been published in 2023 and that the government code now requires formal local adoption of the State Fire Marshal map.
- Board members asked whether the designation would affect insurance; staff said they did not know whether insurance-rating changes would follow and cautioned that such financial impacts are outside the county's direct control.

Action taken

The board voted 5'''0 to adopt the ordinance designating the 2025 San Joaquin County fire-hazard severity zone map as recommended by the State Fire Marshal. Staff said the designation will be used when applying the WUI code for building permits in mapped areas and will be communicated to local fire districts.

What happens next

- Community Development will implement WUI requirements for permitting in designated zones and will coordinate with local fire districts and state agencies as needed.
- Staff indicated they will follow up on mitigation funding options and coordinate with affected districts.

Ending: Adoption formalizes where additional building and defensible-space requirements apply in San Joaquin County and gives local fire districts and permitting staff a tool for enforcing WUI-related measures.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors • Regular Meeting • June 3, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance on June 3 to confirm the 2025 fire-hazard severity zone map recommended by the Office of the State Fire Marshal, placing WUI building-code requirements into effect in the designated local-responsibility areas.","taxTitle","San Joaquin County, California","taxId",3688,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6533889,"Board accepts proposed $3.0 billion FY 2025'26 budget for final hearings; staff projects multi-year pressures",9027,9027000,-1,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd&start=9027&end=0","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd/thumbnail_9027000.jpg","/articles/6533889/San-Joaquin-County/California/Board-accepts-proposed-30-billion-FY-202526-budget-for-final-hearings-staff-projects-multi-year-pressures","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6533889-1a5f9bd55a31aabd872b93fa7c222891/orig.mp4?Expires=1771134405&Signature=iorNtxtjmFEY5JncFn5g28-QDu4DdaSpIKlBA07m0SXUI8Dwv5jZOsnlkUH6gObe0SCnun4rHoVmrFy5t4PLR6OTipm8yQxWygCzd-8lp9~cnAzXcCJFWtTNzSAxtJXt1NJG8GFWnbhPAXYdspmB9~17w4vlB6g~tF9EtqyECD68qFfCZ2WEDhOKq1fCKOqQFJG9bnOZnD9dR3434CGIVHjdj6tYuMZECYxqCz51pJZ2zCQI0QS0eSXwwwcwTur6hQsHlmqzkMmOcxCDBF0Z4NviNwoVi86xKdoEcyBjKztApT9Vizp5BWnVZq8~isK8sBy98egomsBfeYildsnoSA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","San Joaquin County officials presented the proposed FY 2025'26 budget and the Board of Supervisors voted on June 3 to accept it for final hearings. Chief Deputy County Administrator Jennifer VanStein and Assistant County Administrator Brenda Kiley told the board the $3.0 billion appropriation is structurally balanced and does not draw on general-fund reserves in the proposed plan as submitted.

Why it matters: the accepted proposed budget sets spending and policy assumptions for fiscal-year deliberations. The proposed plan includes funding for negotiated labor contracts and continued contributions to reduce the county's unfunded pension liability. Departments requested supplemental items during the process; the CAO recommended limited ongoing additions given fiscal uncertainty.

Key figures presented by staff

- Total proposed appropriation: $3,000,000,000.
- General fund appropriations included in that total: approximately $1,600,000,000.
- General-purpose revenue (net county cost) projected at roughly $476,800,000 (an increase of about $32.7 million from the prior year, as presented).
- Staffing: recommended total of 8,332.1 full-time-equivalent positions (7,684 allocated full-time positions plus 648.1 part-time FTEs).
- Contingency provision in proposed budget: $5,000,000 (to be used for one-time items at final adoption if the board directs).

Multi-year outlook and risks

Staff presented a multi-year forecast that, using current assumptions (moderating property-tax growth, modest departmental revenue growth and included labor costs), projects potential reserve draws beginning in FY 2026'27 with growing deficits through FY 2027'28 under the model used. The CAO emphasized the forecast is sensitive to state and federal funding outcomes and labor settlements and is not an economic forecast but a planning tool.

Board discussion and direction

Supervisors praised staff for conservative budgeting and said they preferred a restrained approach to new ongoing commitments given statewide economic uncertainty and potential state funding changes. The board accepted the proposed budget and scheduled detailed functional-area budget hearings beginning June 17, 2025, to consider supplemental requests and finalize appropriations.

What comes next

- Final budget hearings start June 17, 2025; any additions beyond the proposed budget would typically be funded from the contingency provision.
- Staff and departments will bring supplemental requests and supporting detail back to the board for decision.
- The budget adoption timeline and next steps were described in staff's presentation and are available in the county's digital budget book (published by staff during the meeting).

Ending: The acceptance keeps the county on track for a timely final adoption process while flagging the need for continued fiscal caution and monitoring of state and federal actions.","The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors accepted the county's proposed $3.0 billion FY 2025'26 budget for final hearings, with staff flagging multi-year pressures that could require reserve use beginning in FY 2026'27 under current assumptions.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6533894,"Board approves consent items, budget moves and ordinance changes; summary of votes",7635,3765000,11400000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd&start=3765&end=11400","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd/thumbnail_3765000.jpg","/articles/6533894/San-Joaquin-County/California/Board-approves-consent-items-budget-moves-and-ordinance-changes-summary-of-votes","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6533894-15fdedde8d3fd436857e7f6d5aaab2fa/orig.mp4?Expires=1771134405&Signature=DUs-N8zxkkJsKI94OJAlKsbzyJEcw827y9NbcBFizNguaXK-NTibIgYztzGKKEdo0DlQ7-hFKcxDn5e96UE3QCy7TLczHMK8Il0~BZ1p6AzLrlvoK0RUKuRDnHHYvJfQGu5UaQWZ-i8S2QkEyXgKciINXrfd4YYozLJ~JvPuQStR3nPyAK~vSJafOCtRww8AIk~78G3IOjkoIcsf65LNgsBENJ-n9mEPJY3SnqBERm4-5o1q0bExzkDcuzR5v~6B609ltyqjymyJlQGl2V6TSZMlfvck0pSBgqa-n9P-mE~a5QpSptAClyN01FWy4M7MIJWo8WJB2tvdwVKKDO~qoQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","San Joaquin County's Board of Supervisors moved through a long agenda on June 3, 2025, approving a package of consent items and several formal actions. The board accepted the proposed FY 2025'26 budget for the required budget hearings, adopted or advanced several ordinances and agreements, and approved the county's housing and community development action plan for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The board also announced a closed-session settlement decision in Olas v. County of San Joaquin.

Why this matters: the votes set the county's fiscal and regulatory direction for the coming year, including the public-authority budget for In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), a multi-year increase to the AB 939 compliance fee that funds recycling and hazardous-waste programs, and final steps to recognize new fire-hazard severity zones that affect permitting and building requirements in parts of the county.

Most significant actions taken

- Acceptance of proposed FY 2025'26 budget for public hearing: The board accepted a $3.0 billion proposed county budget that staff said is structurally balanced and will be reviewed during final budget hearings beginning June 17, 2025. The vote to accept the proposed budget carried 5'0'00.

- IHSS Public Authority budget and interagency agreement: The board opened and closed the public hearing for the IHSS Public Authority budget and approved the public-authority budget and the interagency agreement. The board later adopted the memorandum of understanding between the IHSS Public Authority and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 2015; actions recorded in the meeting passed 5'0'00.

- AB 939 compliance-fee amendment (solid-waste funding): Following a public hearing, the board adopted an ordinance to raise the AB 939 compliance fee (the fee that funds county-required waste-diversion and hazardous-waste programs) from $2 per ton to $5 per ton phased over three years, with future annual CPI adjustments. Staff told the board the increase was needed to close an estimated $4.4 million shortfall in program funding; the motion passed 5'0'00.

- Fire-hazard severity zones ordinance: The board adopted an ordinance adding Chapter 7 to Division 1 of Title 4 to designate local fire-hazard severity zones consistent with recommendations from the Office of the State Fire Marshal. The designation applies wildland-urban-interface building requirements in those zones (Mountain House, Tracy, parts of Linden/Peters/ Farmington, Clements areas were among locations noted). The motion passed 5'0'00.

- Development code text amendment: The board approved a planning commission recommendation to remove the county's abandoned-vehicle language from Title 9 (development title) and transfer enforcement responsibility to the Sheriff (Title 6). The board voted 5'0'00 to adopt the change.

- Flood Control / Construction awards (consent): The board approved consent items for the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, including a consulting services agreement and an award of contract for construction work shown on the agenda; the consent passed 5'0'00.

- HUD consolidated plan and 2025'26 annual action plan (CDBG/HOME/ESG): Staff presented the county's five-year consolidated plan and the 2025'26 annual action plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds, including staff'recommended allocations. The board approved forwarding the consolidated plan and annual action plan to HUD for the June 15, 2025 submission deadline; the motion passed 5'0'00.

- Closed-session reportable action: The board reported a settlement motion in Olas v. County of San Joaquin was approved in closed session by a 4'''1 vote (motion by Supervisor Rickman; second by Supervisor Guardia; Supervisor Ding voted no). Meeting remarks stated that settlement terms will be released once all parties have signed.

What the votes do not say: The board's record at the meeting contains limited detail on contract dollar amounts read into the record for some consent awards and on the specific terms of the closed-session settlement; staff indicated those details will be available through the usual contract and settlement records once finalized.

What happens next: the accepted proposed budget moves to final budget hearings starting June 17, staff will file the HUD consolidated plan by the June 15 deadline, and departments will implement the adopted ordinance changes and fee adjustments according to the timelines set in the newly adopted ordinances and contracts. The IHSS Public Authority and the county will proceed under the adopted interagency agreement and the MOU with SEIU Local 2015.

Votes at a glance (as recorded in the meeting):
- Acceptance of proposed FY 2025'26 county budget for final hearings: approved 5'''0.
- IHSS Public Authority budget and interagency agreement: approved 5'''0.
- Adoption of MOU between IHSS Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015: adopted 5'''0.
- AB 939 compliance-fee ordinance amendment (increase to $5/ton phased): adopted 5'''0.
- Ordinance adopting 2025 San Joaquin County fire-hazard severity zone map: adopted 5'''0.
- Development title text amendment (remove abandoned-vehicle provision): adopted 5'''0.
- Flood Control consent contract awards and consulting agreements: approved 5'''0 (consent).
- HUD Consolidated Plan / 2025'26 annual action plan (CDBG/HOME/ESG) forwarded to HUD: approved 5'''0.
- Closed-session reportable settlement (Olas v. County of San Joaquin): approved 4'''''''1 (Supervisor Ding opposed).

Ending: The votes taken at the June 3 meeting set multi-year financial commitments (fee increases, IHSS benefits and wages, budget directions) and cleared several ordinance and code updates for implementation. Staff follow-up items include final contract documents, HUD-plan submission paperwork and administrative steps to implement fee increases and building-permitting changes in newly designated fire-hazard areas.

","San Joaquin County's Board of Supervisors approved a series of consent contracts, ordinance adoptions and the proposed FY 2025'26 budget for final hearings during its June 3 meeting; the board also reported a closed-session settlement decision.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":79,"_47":103,"_49":104,"_51":105,"_53":106,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":107,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":108,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6533885,"Board forwards Consolidated Plan and 2025'26 Annual Action Plan to HUD; staff details CDBG/HOME/ESG recommendations",6084,6084000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd&start=6084&end=0","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd/thumbnail_6084000.jpg","/articles/6533885/San-Joaquin-County/California/Board-forwards-Consolidated-Plan-and-202526-Annual-Action-Plan-to-HUD-staff-details-CDBGHOMEESG-recommendations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6533885-1479e889da828337414af7858230b22f/orig.mp4?Expires=1771134405&Signature=lBBQLTyW0Ddo0iFG0L9HhwH1rqrlDfVIcz7CHynuKK~~fHcclbMoeXULqxu~my74ig65jsGmsfLr~LTaNiuins-ZnpLjRuUK2aI8F99wADTzQl8lHaj94D65xosCPQvjWSLxaQTNhbenjq1~6HLac8KbktGrwMOg7yBQyQSJXPYzTXaOgItcndc49V6y55RcQ9D4FgsYf0q6w7z5ruTxPgPka8n5bKNmR4f55CEUy8vqE9hoaLKgZ9tRIAk0S-DMgVPI-DQ4oA4Epv8--GAMM89iNhtR~aB-cYhyuXzZHC3YXX4kF5FTR0a4lkLf9l9MfkPp9y3mnV3jAtjVt67hjA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","During the June 3 meeting the county's Neighborhood Preservation staff and Human Services Agency presented the five-year consolidated plan (2025'2029) and the accompanying 2025'26 Annual Action Plan required by HUD. The board voted to receive comments and allow staff to submit the plans to HUD by the June 15, 2025 deadline.

Why it matters: HUD entitlement formula funds (CDBG, HOME, ESG) support housing rehabilitation, homeless services, infrastructure improvements in targeted areas and public services for low- and moderate-income residents. The county is the HUD grantee for the urban county jurisdiction and must submit a five-year strategy plus annual spending plans to secure funding.

What staff presented (as shown in meeting slides and remarks)

- CDBG (County): Staff presented recommended county CDBG activities and said program income of $500,000 (from loan repayments) would be added to the entitlement funding. Slides presented the county's public improvements, housing rehab, public services and administration allocations. At points in the presentation slide figures appeared in two places; staff summarized the county recommendation to total $2,300,733 (including program income), and also displayed entitlement-plus-program-income figures in an earlier slide. (Staff and the board acknowledged the presentation contained multiple slides showing entitlement and program-income breakdowns.)

- HOME (County): Staff showed a county HOME allocation of $666,052 (entitlement) with recommended HOME activity funding at $816,052 when program income for down-payment assistance and rehab was added. HUD-mandated CHDO set-aside (15%) and administration (10%) were noted.

- ESG (County): Staff recommended $262,234 in ESG allocations covering outreach, emergency shelter, rapid rehousing/homeless prevention and administration.

- Timing: The county must submit the consolidated plan and the annual action plan to HUD by June 15, 2025, for continuation of entitlement funds; board approval to forward the plan was recorded during the meeting.

Board discussion and public process

Staff described an outreach process with participating cities and stakeholders and said the plan includes an analysis of impediments and data-driven, place-based priorities. Supervisors asked clarifying questions about which cities receive direct HUD allocations (Stockton and Lodi receive direct entitlement funding; Mountain House did not meet the poverty threshold). The board had no substantive changes to the staff'recommended allocations and voted to forward the package.

What happens next

- Neighborhood Preservation will submit the consolidated plan and the annual action plan to HUD by June 15, 2025.
- HUD will review the submission; grant awards and project agreements will be administered by the county and participating cities per the plan.

Ending: The board's approval keeps the county on the HUD entitlement funding track for CDBG, HOME and ESG programs. Staff noted the plan uses program income where available to expand local rehabilitation, down-payment and public-service efforts.","The Board of Supervisors voted June 3 to forward the county's five-year Consolidated Plan (2025'2029) and the 2025'26 Annual Action Plan (CDBG, HOME, ESG) to HUD by the June 15, 2025 submission deadline.",{"_33":110,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":111,"_41":112,"_43":113,"_45":113,"_47":114,"_49":115,"_51":116,"_53":117,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":118,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":119,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6533876,"Board reports closed-session settlement vote in Olas v. County of San Joaquin (4-1 vote)",0,16573000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd&start=16573&end=16573","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3650258-f522fabfd2a8def709e55c6fb2c7afdd/thumbnail_16573000.jpg","/articles/6533876/San-Joaquin-County/California/Board-reports-closed-session-settlement-vote-in-Olas-v-County-of-San-Joaquin-4-1-vote","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6533876-36f2120252299e430ac7783ab10bc2da/orig.mp4?Expires=1771134405&Signature=PquqT~H70Jj5iK1CtZJBTAoREXdMadzeGR-0t~SIA-A8btLby8CzwteRk7csUL~-wcHb~T7Snzrl5hwHYkMZnBTGdwqPf1XPOTAt0sFEHEhWyhHbMIcvb4xhLPhMXhSBibVAmlBBYPJDaAFdH9r1hVwQ6amVsS~Jh142woKVE8RP7gvN4etdbh1q4Mj36ACg2oIDgvx14bbV3D9-zFsWCH~fodJopVvAwBTONvzntrdyNcgRolapd5qwg7wZqjri1J4vXTcZ6Gw3FBCqx94vzVQipqCpYMjiiExR~pBnfyLnypx2JUBFowN5MW~83hWeY~B1w7oqwc2gaZSxwV6UQA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","After returning from closed session on June 3, County Counsel reported that the Board of Supervisors had approved a motion to settle the case Olas v. County of San Joaquin. The motion was moved by Supervisor Rickman, seconded by Supervisor Guardia, and carried by a 4''''''''1 vote; Supervisor Ding was recorded as voting no.

What the board reported

- The board authorized settlement in the specified litigation. County Counsel said the terms and conditions of the settlement would become available upon request following signatures by all parties.

Why this matters

- A reported settlement typically means the county will resolve the litigation by agreement rather than continue contested proceedings; financial or policy implications depend on the settlement terms once they are finalized and made public.

What the board did not disclose at the time

- The meeting report did not include settlement amounts, payment terms, or non-monetary obligations. County Counsel indicated that the settlement paperwork would be released once signed by all parties and available in the public record.

Next steps

- County Counsel will finalize and file settlement documents and provide a public report when the documents are complete.

Ending: The board's closed-session action resolved an outstanding litigation matter by settlement vote; the public record will be updated when the signed settlement documents are available.","The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors reported on June 3 that it approved a settlement motion in the litigation Olas v. County of San Joaquin; the closed-session action passed 4''''''''1 with Supervisor Ding recorded as the lone no vote. County counsel said settlement terms will be made available once all parties sign the agreement.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board adopts State Fire Marshal-recommended fire-hazard severity zones; WUI requirements will apply in designated areas

Board accepts proposed $3.0 billion FY 2025'26 budget for final hearings; staff projects multi-year pressures

Board approves consent items, budget moves and ordinance changes; summary of votes

Board forwards Consolidated Plan and 2025'26 Annual Action Plan to HUD; staff details CDBG/HOME/ESG recommendations

Board reports closed-session settlement vote in Olas v. County of San Joaquin (4-1 vote)