During the Reno City Council meeting on June 4, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed Stonegate development, which aims to convert a large area in Cold Springs into a mix of industrial, residential, and commercial spaces. Residents expressed strong opposition to the project, emphasizing the urgent need for housing rather than warehouses.
Public comments highlighted a growing frustration among community members about the city's housing crisis. Rebecca Flannery, a resident, criticized the council for prioritizing industrial development over residential needs, stating, "Reno needs housing more than we need more jobs." She urged council members to reconsider their decision, arguing that the project would not benefit the community and would exacerbate the cost of living issues.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Emily Ochoa, another resident, echoed these sentiments, sharing her lifelong connection to Cold Springs and her desire to preserve its natural beauty. She voiced concerns about increased traffic and the potential loss of wildlife, stating, "We didn’t move out here for warehouses and traffic. We moved here for peace, quiet, and nature." Ochoa also pointed out the existence of vacant warehouses in the area, questioning the necessity of more industrial space.
The council's discussion included a disclosure from a council member regarding a potential conflict of interest related to the Stonegate project, which was noted but deemed unrelated to the current decision-making process.
As the meeting concluded, the council was urged to engage further with constituents to address their concerns and ensure that future developments align with the community's needs. The ongoing debate over the Stonegate project reflects broader issues of housing availability and community preservation in Reno, underscoring the importance of balancing development with the needs of residents.