Reno City Council debates Stonegate development and water management concerns

The Reno City Council meeting on June 4, 2025, highlighted significant discussions surrounding the proposed Stonegate development and its implications for water management and flood control in the region. As the council navigated concerns raised by community members and experts, the meeting underscored the complexities of balancing development with environmental sustainability.

One of the primary concerns discussed was the potential impact of increased industrial development on local flood management systems. A council member emphasized that while the number of residential buildings might decrease, the introduction of large industrial structures would lead to more concrete surfaces, which could exacerbate runoff issues. This shift in land use raises questions about the adequacy of the current flood management strategies, particularly when compared to a more comprehensive regional system previously proposed.

Water supply was another critical topic, with representatives from Great Basin Water Company addressing concerns about groundwater levels and the reliability of water sources for the Stonegate project. They assured the council that the development would not only meet its own water needs but also contribute positively to the existing water supply system. The company highlighted that Stonegate would utilize both groundwater and surface water, providing redundancy and flexibility to the water supply in the area.

However, some council members expressed skepticism regarding the assurances from Great Basin, citing discrepancies between the company's reports and community concerns about declining groundwater levels. The discussion revealed a tension between the need for development and the potential risks to existing water resources, with calls for more thorough assessments of the hydrological impacts of the proposed project.

The meeting concluded with a motion to adopt the ordinance related to the Stonegate development, but not without dissent. Some council members voiced disappointment over the perceived lack of responsiveness from the developers to community feedback, suggesting that the decision-making process may have overlooked local concerns.

As the council moves forward, the implications of these discussions will be crucial for the future of water management and urban development in Reno. The balance between accommodating growth and protecting vital resources remains a pressing challenge for city officials and the community alike.